Epstein Secrets

nal prosecution of Epstein. Through her attorney, James Eisenberg, Esq., Jane Doe 2 declined to be interviewed without a grant of use immunity. Mr. Eisenberg was retained and paid by Epstein to provide representation to Jane Doe 2. The Government applied for and received immunity for Jane Doe 2 under 18

became known as a possible victim of Epstein. Jane Doe 2 was openly hostile to the idea of a criminal prosecution of Epstein. Through her attorney, James Eisenberg, Esq., Jane Doe 2 declined to be interviewed without a grant of use immunity. Mr. Eisenberg was retained and paid by Epstein to provide representat

l precludes a party from claiming the benefits of a contract while simultaneously attempting to avoid the burdens that contract imposes." Blinco v. Green Tree Servicing, LLC 400 F.3d 1308, 1312 (11ih Cir. 2005)(citations omitted). The same agreement that Jane Doe 1 now condemns was exploited by her in maintaining he

.,' Jane Doe No. 2 refused to be interviewed by the FBI and U.S. Attorney's Office unless she was granted immunity. Ex. A, Sept. 21, 2006 Ltr. from Eisenberg to AUSA Villafafia; Ex. S, 6-12. Thus, she was unwilling to provide any information regarding her encounters with Epstein unless she was assured he

ners during the investigation of Epstein are highly relevant in determining whether each petitioner can even invoke the CVRA. Through her attorney, James Eisenberg, Esq.,' Jane Doe No. 2 refused to be interviewed by the FBI and U.S. Attorney's Office unless she was granted immunity. Ex. A, Sept. 21, 2006 Ltr.

l precludes a party from claiming the benefits of a contract while simultaneously attempting to avoid the burdens that contract imposes." Blinco v. Green Tree Servicing LLC 400 F.3d 1308, 1312 (11th Cir. 2005), citing Humana 285 F.3d at 976. As third-party beneficiaries of the NPA, petitioners claimed the benefit o

q.,' Jane Doe No. 2 refused to be interviewed by the FBI and U.S. Attorney's Office unless she was granted immunity. Ex. A, Sept. 21, 2006 Is. from Eisenberg to AUSA Villafafia; Ex. S, ¶16-12. Thus, she was unwilling to provide any information regarding her encounters with Epstein unless she was assured h

ners during the investigation of Epstein are highly relevant in determining whether each petitioner can even invoke the CVRA. Through her attorney, James Eisenberg, Esq.,' Jane Doe No. 2 refused to be interviewed by the FBI and U.S. Attorney's Office unless she was granted immunity. Ex. A, Sept. 21, 2006 Is. f

l precludes a party from claiming the benefits of a contract while simultaneously attempting to avoid the burdens that contract imposes." Blinco v. Green Tree Servicing LLC 400 F.3d 1308, 1312 (11th Cir. 2005), citing Humana, 285 F.3d at 976. As third-party beneficiaries of the NPA, petitioners claimed the benefit