Epstein Secrets

nal prosecution of Epstein. Through her attorney, James Eisenberg, Esq., Jane Doe 2 declined to be interviewed without a grant of use immunity. Mr. Eisenberg was retained and paid by Epstein to provide representation to Jane Doe 2. The Government applied for and received immunity for Jane Doe 2 under 18

became known as a possible victim of Epstein. Jane Doe 2 was openly hostile to the idea of a criminal prosecution of Epstein. Through her attorney, James Eisenberg, Esq., Jane Doe 2 declined to be interviewed without a grant of use immunity. Mr. Eisenberg was retained and paid by Epstein to provide representat

U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida 99 N£ 4 Street Miami, FL 33132 (305) 961-9100 - Telephone (305) 530-6444 - Facsimile May 16, 2016 Honorable Dave Lee Brannon United

nal prosecution of Epstein. Through her attorney, James Eisenberg, Esq., Jane Doe 2 declined to be interviewed without a grant of use immunity. Mr. Eisenberg was retained and paid by Epstein to provide representation to Jane Doe 2. The Government applied for and received immunity for Jane Doe 2 under 18

became known as a possible victim of Epstein. Jane Doe 2 was openly hostile to the idea of a criminal prosecution of Epstein. Through her attorney, James Eisenberg, Esq., Jane Doe 2 declined to be interviewed without a grant of use immunity. Mr. Eisenberg was retained and paid by Epstein to provide representat

U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida 99 N£ 4 Street Miami, FL 33132 (305) 961-9100 - Telephone (305) 530-6444 - Facsimile May 16, 2016 Honorable Dave Lee Brannon United

the investigation if the facts are known or might attempt to escape if they have reason to believe certain indictments will issue. United States v. Eisenberg, 711 F.2d 959, 961 (11th Cir. 1983) (citing United States v. Procter & Gamble Co., 356 U.S. 677, 681 n.6 (1958)). Several of the "facts" contained

ocket 04/07/2011 Page 15 of 15 SERVICE LIST Jane Does 1 and 2 v. United States, Case No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Bradley J. Edwards, Esq., Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale,

an earlier date. • • EFTA00206900 • • Bradley J. Edwards, Esq, Counsel fo • Paul G. Cassell, Counsel for • Jay C. Howell, Counsel for • James Eisenberg, Esq., Original counsel fon? • Jeffrey Epstein, Defendant in state criminal action and party to USAO-SDFLA Non-Prosecution Agreement • Lilly Ann

I write this letter in my capacity as the Electronic Discovery Coordinator within the Civil Division of the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (USAO-SDFLA) to advise you of the USAO-SDFLA's legal obligation to preserve documents and data relevant to the lawsuit and to enlist your

(Jane Doe Petitioner in Civil action ???) • Bradley J. Edwards, Esq, Counsel for • Paul G. Cassell, Counsel for • Jay'. Howell, Counsel for • James Eisenberg, Esq., Original counsel for • Jeffrey Epstein, Defendant in state criminal action and party to USAO-SDFLA Non-Prosecution Agreement • Lilly Ann

I write this letter in my capacity as the Electronic Discovery Coordinator within the Civil Division of the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (USAO-SDFLA) to advise you of the USAO-SDFLA's legal obligation to preserve documents and data relevant to the lawsuit and to enlist your

oner in Civil action ???) • Bradley J. Edwards, Esq, Counsel for • Paul G. Cassell, Counsel • Jay C. Howell, Counsel for 99 EFTA00206925 • James Eisenberg, Esq., Original counsel foa 9999 • Jeffrey Epstein, Defendant in state criminal action and party to USAO-SDFLA Non-Prosecution Agreement • Lilly

I write this letter in my capacity as the Electronic Discovery Coordinator within the Civil Division of the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (USAO-SDFLA) to advise you of the USAO-SDFLA's legal obligation to preserve documents and data relevant to the lawsuit and to enlist your

the investigation if the facts are known or might attempt to escape if they have reason to believe certain indictments will issue. United States v. Eisenberg, 711 F.2d 959, 961 (11th Cir. 1983) (citing United States v. Procter & Gamble Co., 356 U.S. 677, 681 n.6 (1958)). Several of the "facts" contained

ocket 04)07:2011 Page 15 of 15 SERVICE LIST Jane Does 1 and 2 v. United States, Case No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Bradley J. Edwards, Esq., Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale,

the investigation if the facts are known or might attempt to escape if they have reason to believe certain indictments will issue. United States v. Eisenberg, 711 F.2d 959, 961 (11th Cir. 1983) (citing United States v. Procter & Gamble Co., 356 U.S. 677, 681 n.6 (1958)). Several of the "facts" contained

ocket 04)07:2011 Page 10 of 10 SERVICE LIST Jane Does 1 and 2 v. United States, Case No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Bradley J. Edwards, Esq., Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L. 425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale,

of Justice Federal Bureau of Investigation FBI - W West Pa 401 January 10. 2008 J me I 8 a 111 ea , 1 Re. Case Number: 31E-MM-108062 Dear James Eisenberg: You have requested to receive notifications fotEa This case is currently under investigation. This can be a lengthy process and we request your c

keep your contact information current. Sincerely, Victim Specialist TOTAL P.07 EFTA00215668 U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida 500 South Australian Ave.. Suite 400 West Palm Beach. FL 3340! August I I, 2006 DELIVERY BY AND Miss Re: Crime Victims' and Witness

any information that I wanted considered by the United States Attorney's Office. Villafafia told me that she believed Jane Doe 2 was represented by James Eisenberg and I told her that I understood she had been in the past but no longer was and that I was led to believe she now wanted to cooperate. At the time o

is the court persuaded by the government's "futility" argument, derived from its stated perception that the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida . . . would be constrained to honor the terms of the September 24, 2007 agreement even if the court were to set it aside and order the g