Epstein Secrets

tection for their investigations while the victims were minors, but completely eliminate those protections the moment one of the victims turned 18. The District Court for the Northern District of Florida confirmed this position and specifically rejected the plaintiffs' contrary argument. See Doe v. Francis. No. 5:

Sealed Document. (yc) (Entered: 07/10/2008) 07/10/2008 20 Sealed Document. (yc) (Entered: 07/10/2008) 07/16/2008 21. ORDER denying motion to file Ex Parte and Under Seal. The clerk shall unseal DE 19 and 20 and make them available for inspection through CM/ECF at the earliest possible time. Signed by

protection of the attorney-client privilege, since their existence is a fact and not a 'communication.'" Id. at *2 (citing Upjohn, 449 U.S. at 391). The District Court noted that if the boxes had never been removed from the home and the government had learned of their existence only through the use of a protected

pendency of the investigation, and the requirements of Grand Jury secrecy, the United States asks that the Court allow the United States to file two Ex Parte declarations, which address the factual issues raised by Intervenor Epstein, without being forced to disclose the status of the grand jury investig

tection for their investigations while the victims were minors, but completely eliminate those protections the moment one of the victims turned 18. The District Court for the Northern District of Florida confirmed this position and specifically rejected the plaintiffs' contrary argument. See Doe I. Francis. No. 5:

Criminal Action by Jeffrey Epstein (previously filed as 20 sealed document) (bs) (Entered: 07/17/2008) 07/16/2008 21 ORDER denying motion to file Ex Parte and Under Seal. The clerk shall unseal DE 19 and 20 and make them available for inspection through CM/ECF at the earliest possible time. Signed by