Epstein Secrets

to granting bail. The proposed conditions ensure her presence at home in plain sight of (and the security guards), GPS- monitored, and under strict Pretrial supervision. D. Ms. Maxwell Has Waived Her Extradition Rights and Could Not Seek Refuge in the United Kingdom or France At the initial hearing, t

WL 1456536 (3d Cir. July 13, 1999) 15 United States v. Cohen, No. C 10-00547, 2010 WL 5387757 n.11 (N.D. Cal. Dec. 20, 2010) 15 United States v. Dreier, 596 F. Supp. 2d 831 (S.D.N.Y. 2009) 27 United States v. English, 629 F.3d 311 (2d Cir. 2011) 7 United States v. Epstein, 155 F. Supp. 2d 323 (E.

United States v. DiGiacomo, 746 F. Supp. 1176 (D. Mass. 1990) 14 United States v Dominguez, 783 F.2d 702 (7th Cir. 1986) 10 United States v Dreier, 596 F. Supp. 2d 831 (S.D.N.Y. 2009) 21 United States y English, 629 F.3d 311 (2d Cir. 2011) 10, 11 ii EFTA00018517 --- PAGE BREAK --- Cas

continue to need security guards to protect her upon release. Under the circumstances, if the Court requires it, the security guards could report to Pretrial Services.16 10 In United States v. Houston!, 932 F.3d 79 (2d Cir. 2019), the Second Circuit curtailed the circumstances under which a court can gra

n granted release subject to conditions), aff'd, 749 F. App'x 20 (2d Cir. 2018); United States v. Dreier, 596 F. Supp. 2d 831, 832 (S.D.N.Y. 2009) (Marc Dreier, accused of "colossal criminality" and alleged to be a "high flight risk," granted release subject to conditions); United States v. Madoff, 586 F. S

intending to resist any subsequent extradition that might result. The Court is unpersuaded. 13 EFTA00013319 --- PAGE BREAK --- United States v. Dreier, 596 F. Supp. 2d 831 (S.D.N.Y. 2009), and United States v. Madoff 586 F. Supp. 2d 240 (S.D.N.Y. 2009)). The Court's concerns regarding the absence

he evidence of a lack of candor is, if anything, stronger now than in July 2020, as it is clear to the Court that the Defendant's representations to Pretrial Services were woefully incomplete. That lack of candor raises significant concerns as to whether the Court has now been provided a full and accurat