Back to People & Entities
Pretrial
Organization
7
Total Mentions
7
Documents
46
Connected Entities
Pretrial Services is an organization that prepares cases for trial in court, providing recommendations to the court concerning release conditions and supervising defendants released from custody during the pretrial phase. In the context of the Epstein case, Pretrial Services was involved in evaluating individuals like Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein, and in overseeing deferred prosecution agreements.
Pretrial Services appears in several court documents related to Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. They are mentioned in connection with Maxwell's relationship with her spouse and her representations to Pretrial Services regarding a divorce. The organization is also referenced in the context of security arrangements for Maxwell upon release and the potential for security guards to report to Pretrial Services. In one document, it is noted that Epstein's representations to Pretrial Services were "woefully incomplete," raising concerns about candor.
Key Highlights
- •Pretrial Services evaluated Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, gathering information to assess risk and make recommendations to the court.
- •The organization was involved in supervising defendants and ensuring they followed release conditions.
- •Concerns were raised regarding the accuracy and completeness of information provided to Pretrial Services by Epstein.
Frequently Asked Questions
Books for Further Reading
Perversion of Justice: The Jeffrey Epstein Story
Julie K. Brown
Investigative journalism that broke the Epstein case open
Filthy Rich: The Jeffrey Epstein Story
James Patterson
Bestselling account of Epstein's crimes and network
Relentless Pursuit: My Fight for the Victims of Jeffrey Epstein
Bradley J. Edwards
Victims' attorney's firsthand account
Document Mentions (7)
1 mention
he evidence of a lack of candor is, if anything, stronger now than in July 2020, as it is clear to the Court that the Defendant's representations to Pretrial Services were woefully incomplete. That lack of candor raises significant concerns as to whether the Court has now been provided a full and accurat
Page: EFTA00013322 →1 mention
e defendant has been indicted, there will be no preliminary hearing, and that takes us to the question of bail. In that regard, I have received the Pretrial Services report. I have also received a letter from the SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS. P.C. EFTA00015609 --- PAGE BREAK --- j782epsC kjc 4 5 6
Page: EFTA00015609 →1 mention
e defendant has been indicted, there will be no preliminary hearing, and that takes us to the question of bail. In that regard, I have received the Pretrial Services report. I have also received a letter from the SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. EFTA00015664 --- PAGE BREAK --- j782epsC kjc 4 5 6
Page: EFTA00015664 →Sponsored
1 mention
address the merits, the government attempts to dismiss the significance of Ms. Maxwell's relationship with her spouse, noting that Ms. Maxwell told Pretrial Services that she was in the process of getting a divorce and that her spouse did not step forward as a co-signer at the initial bail hearing. (Id.
Page: EFTA00016776 →1 mention
continue to need security guards to protect her upon release. Under the circumstances, if the Court requires it, the security guards could report to Pretrial Services.16 10 In United States v. Houston!, 932 F.3d 79 (2d Cir. 2019), the Second Circuit curtailed the circumstances under which a court can gra
Page: EFTA00018538 →1 mention
address the merits, the government attempts to dismiss the significance of Ms. Maxwell's relationship with her spouse, noting that Ms. Maxwell told Pretrial Services that she was in the process of getting a divorce and that her spouse did not step forward as a co-signer at the initial bail hearing. (Id.
Page: EFTA00019298 →Sponsored
1 mention
s this letter to inform the Court that the parties have entered into deferred prosecution agreements (the "Agreements"), which have been approved by Pretrial Services and are included for the Court's consideration.' After a thorough investigation, and based on the facts of this case and the personal circ
Page: EFTA00028582 →Sponsored
Connected Entities(20 of 46)
Services
Organization6 docs6 co-mentions
Jeffrey Epstein
PersonAmerican sex offender and financier (1953–2019)
6 docs6 co-mentions
Pretrial Services
Organization6 docs6 co-mentions
United States
LocationCountry located primarily in North America
6 docs6 co-mentions
Ghislaine Maxwell
PersonBritish socialite and sex trafficker, daughter of Robert Maxwell, accomplice of Jeffrey Epstein
4 docs4 co-mentions
N.D. Cal.
Location4 docs4 co-mentions
Michael Cohen
PersonAmerican former attorney and former Republican official
3 docs3 co-mentions
Denver
LocationConsolidated city-county and capital of Colorado, United States
3 docs3 co-mentions
Southern
Location3 docs3 co-mentions
the French Ministry of Justice
Organization3 docs3 co-mentions
United Kingdom
LocationCountry in north-west Europe
3 docs3 co-mentions
Christian R. Everdell
Person3 docs3 co-mentions
MC
Mark S. Cohen
Person3 docs3 co-mentions
Laura A. Menninger
Person3 docs3 co-mentions
JP
Jeffrey Pagliuca
Person3 docs3 co-mentions
Harry Reid
PersonAmerican politician (1939–2021)
2 docs2 co-mentions
MW
Martin Weinberg
PersonAmerican attorney (born 1946)
2 docs2 co-mentions
Mattis
PersonMale given name
2 docs2 co-mentions
Eric Holder
PersonUnited States Attorney General from 2009 to 2015
2 docs2 co-mentions
Jean-Luc Brunel
PersonFrench model scout (1946–2022)
2 docs2 co-mentions