Epstein Secrets

t's earlier cases [referring to Boyd ], have been discredited by later opinions." Andresen v. Maryland , 427 U.S. 463, 472 (1976). In 1984, Justice O'Connor wrote a concurring opinion in United States v. Doe , 465 U.S. 605 (1984), just to make explicit what is implicit in the analysis of that opinion; t

ing filed under seal. Assistant U.S. Attorney SERVICE LIST In re Federal Grand Jury Subpoenas No. OLY-63 and OLY-64 United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Assistant U.S. Attorney U.S. Attorney's Office West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Telephone: Facsimile: Attorney for United States EFTA0021

rt's earlier cases [referring to Boyd ], have been discredited by later opinions." Andresen I Maryland , 427 U.S. 463, 472 (1976). In 1984, Justice O'Connor wrote a concurring opinion in United States I Doe , 465 U.S. 605 (1984), just to make explicit what is implicit in the analysis of that opinion; th

ing filed under seal. Assistant U.S. Attorney SERVICE LIST In re Federal Grand Jury Subpoenas No. OLY-63 and OLY-64 United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorney for United States EFTA00223014 William L. Richey, Esq. Attorney for Subpoenaed Parties Riley Kiraly

UCE: All right. So we are going to 22 break. We have an agreement on the record that 23 Detective Recarey, and correct me if I am 24 wrong, Ms. O'Connor will get back to us through 25 you sometime next week with a few available 46 (Pages 307 to 310) PROSE COURT REPORTING AGENCY, INC. Electronical

Hopkins, RPR, FPR Notary Public, State of Florida 24 Prose Can Reporting Job No.: 1509 25 "a".. 1 Page 3 2 UNTIED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 4 CASE NO. 10-80309 5 JANE DOE NO. 103, 6 7 -vs- VOLUME I OF II 8 JEFFREY EPSTEIN, 9 Defendant. 10 11 12 DEPOSITION OF 13

ourt's earlier cases [referring to Boyd], have been discredited by later opinions." Andresen v. Maryland, 427 U.S. 463, 472 (1976). In 1984, Justice O'Connor wrote a concurring opinion in United States v. Doe, 465 U.S. 605 (1984), just to make explicit what is implicit in the analysis of that opinion; th

ida 33131. Phone: -• Fax: • www.RoyBlack.com EFTA00179070 •••gC •• • 4 (Re.. 06"2005)Scaled Document nuking Fonn UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Southern District of Florida Case Number: FGJ 07-103 (WPB) OLY•63 & OLY-64 IN RE GRAND JURY SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM ISSUED TO WILLIAM RILEY Plaintiff Defendant Pa

means. 3 Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA P-000951 EFTA00228331 Attorney-client privileged material Law enforcement sensitive been justified under O'Connor'. Ortega, the defendant no longer retained any reasonable expectation of privacy in the remaining contents of the computer and disk, and thus a com

Account Number Signature of Vendor's Authorizing Official Name & Title of Authorizing Official Please Return or Fax to: U.S. Attorney's Office Southern District of Florida 99 NE 4 street, Suite 200 Miami, FL. 33132 Attention: Fax Number The Debt Collection Improvement Act of 1996 requires that payments m

far the federal government may go into matters of traditionally state concern, will continue to arise and vill be answered case-by-case. As Justice O'Connor said in her dissent in Gonzales Raid:, 545 U.S. I, 47 (2005), "... the task is to identify a mode of analysis that allows Congress to regulate mor

LAW 00 ICC,. Y. GERALD B. LEFCOURT. P.C. Jeffrey Sloman, Esq. Matthew Menchel, Esq. Andrew LS. A. Marie , Esq. The Unite!1Mttorney's Office Southern District of Florida July 6,2007 Page 23 Again, we and our colleagues thank you for your attention at the June 26 meeting. I welcome any questions or comme