3
Shared Docs
0
Same-Page
5 / 3
Mentions
(d) 24 N.Y. Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 3.8, cmt. [6A] 16 Constitutional Provisions U.S. CONST. amend. IV 22 U.S. CONST. amend. V 21 U.S. CoNST. amend. VI 26 iii EFTA00028932 --- PAGE BREAK --- Table of Exhibits EXHIBIT J: Notes of Feb. II, 2021 Call with AUSA (Sealed) EXHIBIT K: Hand
Page: EFTA00028933 →District of New York. Contrary to the government's portrayal of events, what happened here is that a prosecutor from the public corruption unit of the United States Attorney's Office, in an a parte proceeding, affirmatively misled Chief Judge McMahon to circumvent a Protective Order entered by one of her colleagues. The prosecut
Page: EFTA00028934 →dmits the following facts are true: • On February 29, 2016, AUSA M, the Human Trafficking Coordinator and Project Safe Childhood Coordinator for the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York, Ex. J, p 1, met with Peter Skinner of Boies Schiller, Stan Pottinger, and Brad Edwards, who represented M,
Page: EFTA00028935 →P. 5.2 19 M. Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 3.3(d) 24 MI. Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 3.8, cmt. [6A] 16 Constitutional Provisions U.S. CONST. amend. IV 22 U.S. CONST. amend. V 21 U.S. CoNST. amend. VI 26 iii EFTA00029103 --- PAGE BREAK --- Table of Exhibits EXHIBIT J: Notes of Fe
Page: EFTA00029103 →District of New York. Contrary to the government's portrayal of events, what happened here is that a prosecutor from the public corruption unit of the United States Attorney's Office, in an a parte proceeding, affirmatively misled Chief Judge McMahon to circumvent a Protective Order entered by one of her colleagues. The prosecut
Page: EFTA00029105 →] or anyone else." Id. 7 Two other aspects to the privilege log are notable: (a) In the litigation, Boies Schiller did not produce its emails with the U.S. Attorney's Office to Maxwell, despite the fact that they were directly responsive to a Request for Production of Documents Maxwell served just a couple of weeks afte
Page: EFTA00029109 →e, 462 U.S. 696 (1983) 3 United States v. Thomas, 736 F.3d 54 (1st Cir. 2013) 6 ii EFTA00015305 --- PAGE BREAK --- Constitutional Provisions U.S. CONST. amend. IV passim U.S. CONST. amend. V passim iii EFTA00015306 --- PAGE BREAK --- Ghislaine Maxwell moves under the Fourth Amendment, Martinde
Page: EFTA00015306 →and the Fi h Amendment to Suppress All Evidence Obtained from the government's Subpoena t and to Dismiss Counts Five and Six upon the following: U.S. Attorney's Office SDNY New York, NY 10007 s/ Christian R. Everdell 18 EFTA00015324
Page: EFTA00015324 →Entities connected to both U.S. Attorney's Office and U.S. CONST.

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSONDistrict Court for the Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATION
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATIONJane Doe
PERSON
Bradley Edwards
PERSONSecond Circuit
ORGANIZATIONLaura Menninger
PERSONJeffrey Pagliuca
PERSONCohen & Gresser LLP
ORGANIZATIONBobbi C. Sternheim
PERSON
David Boies
PERSON
Christian R. Everdell
PERSONCriminal Division
ORGANIZATION
Brady
PERSON
Martha Stewart
PERSON
Boies Schiller
ORGANIZATIONSigrid McCawley
PERSON
Stephen Hawking
PERSON
Boies Schiller Flexner LLP
ORGANIZATION