Epstein Secrets

Pagliuca, Esq. Haddon Mor an and Foreman, P.C. Dear Counsel: The Silvio I. Motto Building January 10, 2021 Bobbi Sternheim, Esq. Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (MN) We write in response to your letter of December 28, 2020, in which you request a bill of

r LLP Laura Menninger, Esq. Jeffrey Pagliuca, Esq. Haddon Mor an and Foreman, P.C. Dear Counsel: The Silvio I. Motto Building January 10, 2021 Bobbi Sternheim, Esq. Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (MN) We write in response to your letter of December 28, 20

n omitted); see also, e.g., United States v. Mahabub, No. 13 Cr. 908 (MN), 2014 WL 4243657, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 26, 2014) (same); United States v. Mandell, 710 F. Supp. 2d 368, 384 (S.D.N.Y. 2010) (same). "Acquisition of evidentiary details is not the function of the bill of particulars." United States

ar Counsel: The Silvio J. Mono Building One Saint Andrew's Plaza New York. New York 10007 January 10, 2021 Bobbi Sternheim, Esq. Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) We write in response to your letter of December 28, 2020, in which you request a bill of

. Haddon Mor an and Foreman, P.C. Dear Counsel: The Silvio J. Mono Building One Saint Andrew's Plaza New York. New York 10007 January 10, 2021 Bobbi Sternheim, Esq. Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) We write in response to your letter of December 28, 2

n omitted); see also, e.g., United States v. Mahabub, No. 13 Cr. 908 (MN), 2014 WL 4243657, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 26, 2014) (same); United States v. Mandell, 710 F. Supp. 2d 368, 384 (S.D.N.Y. 2010) (same). "Acquisition of evidentiary details is not the function of the bill of particulars." United States

ear Counsel: The Si!lo J. Mollo Building One Saint Andrew's Plaza New York, New York 10007 January 8, 2021 Bobbi Sternheim, Esq. Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim New York, NY 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (MN) We write in response to your letter of December 28, 2020, in which you

n omitted); see also, e.g., United States v. Mahabub, No. 13 Cr. 908 (MN), 2014 WL 4243657, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 26, 2014) (same); United States v. Mandell, 710 F. Supp. 2d 368, 384 (S.D.N.Y. 2010) (same). "Acquisition of evidentiary details is not the function of the bill of particulars." United States