Epstein Secrets

risdiction of this Court. This case is properly removable because it falls within the original jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. See 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a)(1) (establishing that federal district courts have original v. Epstein et at, Case No. 50 2008 CA 005240 XXXX M

ly where it was filed within 30 days after the last defendant was served). Second, in accordance with section 1446(d), defendants have served this Notice of Removal on July 21, 2008, Third, in accordance with section 1446(6), all of the defendants join this Petition and consent to removal. District courts may

risdiction of this Court. This case is properly removable because it falls within the original jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. See 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a)(1) (establishing that federal district courts have original I C.M.A. v. Epstein et aL, Case No. 50 2008 CA 005

ly where it was filed within 30 days after the last defendant was served). Second, in accordance with section 1446(d), defendants have served this Notice of Removal on July 21, 2008. Third, in accordance with section 1446(b), all of the defendants join this Petition and consent to removal. 4 District courts m

ion into allegations arising out of the same incidents alleged in the instant action (Grand Jury No. 07-103 (WPB), United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida) ("the Federal Criminal Action"). In September 2007, the USAO and Mr. Epstein entered into a highly unusual and unprecedented deferred-

e case to federal district court, where it was ultimately transferred to the Southern District of Florida. The League filed a Motion to Quash DER's Notice of Removal, which motion was argued before Judge William Hoeveler on July 10, 1991, and was granted on September 10, 1991. The federal court held that there

l investigation, he has not been charged in EFTA00183654 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/15/2008 Page 2 of 8 *el the Southern District of Florida. Title 18, U.S.C., Section 3771(b)(1) provides in pertinent part that, "[i]n any court proceeding involving an offense against a crime v

e case to federal district court, where it was ultimately transferred to the Southern District of Florida. The League filed a Motion to Quash DER's Notice of Removal, which motion was argued before Judge William Hoeveler on July 10, 1991, and was granted on September 10, 1991. The federal court held that there