Epstein Secrets

imitations and guideposts as set forth in BMW of North America v. Gore, 116 S.Ct 1589 (1996); Philip Morris USA v. Williams, 127 S.Ct. 1057 (2007); State Farm v. Campbell, 123 S.Ct 1513 (2003); Engle v. Liqoet Group, Inc., 945 So.2d 1246 (Fla. 2006). The Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of th

anting the relief requested above, and for such other and further relief as this Court may deem just and proper. By: ROBERT D. C ITTON, JR., ESQ. MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ. Certificate of Service I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF.

e Suite 400 West Palm Beach , FL 33401-2918 Amiens United States of America represented by Fax: Email: LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Michael James Pike Burman Critton Luttier & Coleman 515 N Flagler Drive Suite 400 West Palm Beach , FL 33401-2918 Fax: 51 -3148 Email: ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Un

y Jane Doe's Motion. 18. In Perry, plaintiff sought to collect under a homeowner's insurance policy following the destruction of her home by fire. State Farm asserted an arson defense. State Farm filed a motion pursuant to 5 U.S.C. §552a(b)(l l) seeking to require the Social Security Administration to te

Y EPSTEIN, respectfully requests the Court deny Jane Doe's Motion (DE #486) and grant any additional relief the Court deems just and proper. By: s/Michael J. Pike ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR., ESQ. Florida Bar #224162 MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ. Florida Bar #617296 Certificate of Service I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true

p Morris USA v. Williams, 127 S.Ct. 1057 (2007); State Farm v. Campbell, 123 S.Ct 1513 (2003); Engle v. Ligge

, ESQ. Florida Bar o. 224162 [email protected] MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ. Florida Bar #617296 [email protected] BU

limitations and guideposts as set forth in BMW of North America v. Gore 116 S.Ct 1589 (1996); Philip Morris USA v. Williams, 127 S.Ct. 1057 (2007); State Farm v. Campbell, 123 S.Ct 1513 (2003). Engle v. Liqqet Group, Inc., 945 So.2d 1246 (Fla. 2006). The Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of th

UTTIER & COLEMAN, LLP 515 N. Flagler Drive, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, F). 33401 (561) 842-2820 By: Robert D. ritton, Jr. Florida B r #224162 Michael J. Pike Florida Bar #617296 Counsel for n ffrey Epstein EFTA00725729

limitations and guideposts as set forth in BMW of North America v. Gore, 116 S.Ct 1589 (1996); Philip Morris USA v. Williams 127 S.Ct. 1057 (2007); State Farm v. Campbell, 123 S.Ct 1513 (2003); Engle v. Liqoet Group, Inc., 945 So.2d 1246 (Fla. 2006). The Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of th

Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 Co-Counsel for Dofendant Jeffrey Epstein Respectfully submi d, By: ROBERT D. RITTON, JR., ESQ. Florida Bar o. 224162 MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ. 17296 BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN 515 N. Flagler Drive, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 (Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstei

imitations and guideposts as set forth in BMW of North America v. Gore, 116 S.Ct 1589 (1996); Philip Morris USA v. Williams, 127 S.Ct. 1057 (2007); State Farm v. Campbell, 123 S.Ct 1513 (2003); Engle v. Ligget Group, Inc., 945 So.2d 1246 (Fla. 2006). The Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of th

alm Beach, FL 33401-5012 o- counsel or e►en an Respectfully submitted, Jeffrey Epstein By: ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR., ESQ. Florida Bar No. 224162 MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ. Florida Bar #617296 LUTTIER & COLEMAN 515 N. Flagler Drive, Suite 400 401 (Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein) EFTA00221255

imitations and guideposts as set forth in BMW of North America v. Gore, 116 S.Ct 1589 (1996); Philip Morris USA v. Williams, 127 S.Ct. 1057 (2007); State Farm v. Campbell 123 S.Ct 1513 (2003); Engle v. Liqqet Group, Inc., 945 So.2d 1246 (Fla. 2006). The Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the

, P.A. iCo-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein Respectfully submitted, By: ROBERT D. ITTON, JR., ESQ. Florida Bar 224162 rcritabcIcla .com MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ. Florida Bar #617296 MDike(Wbciciaw.com BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN ...V II,' IV \II V (Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein

imitations and guideposts as set forth in BMW of North America v. Gore, 116 S.Ct 1589 (1996)• Philip Morris USA v. Williams, 127 S.Ct. 1057 (2007); State Farm v. Campbell, 123 S.Ct 1513 (2003); Engle v. Ligget Group, Inc., 945 So.2d 1246 (Fla. 2006). The Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of th

m Beach. FL 33401-5012 Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein Respectfully submitted, By: ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR., ESQ. Florida Bar No. 224162 MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ. Florida Bar #617296 BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN 515 N. Flagler Drive, Suite 400 01 (Co-Counsel for Defen ant effrey Epstein) EFTA0

nt." See generally, F.T.C. supra, at fn.4, citing United States v. Premises Located at Route 13 946 F.2d 749, 756 (11th Cir.1991) (citing Pervis v. State Farm and Cas. Co., 901 F.2d 944, 948 (11th Cir.1990)). See also S.E.C. v. Keith Group of Companies, Inc. 1998 WL 1670405 (S.D. Fla. 1998)("When a party i

691 jaaescabellsouth.net Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein Respe By: ROB R D. C ITTON , ESQ. Florida Bar No. 22416 rcrit(bciclaw.com MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ. Florida Bar #617296 mpikeebcIclaw.com BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN 515 N. Flagler Drive, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 561-84

imitations and guideposts as set forth in BMW of North America v. Gore, 116 S.Ct 1589 (1996)• Philip Morris USA v. Williams, 127 S.Ct. 1057 (2007)• State Farm v. Campbell, 123 S.Ct 1513 (2003); Engle v. Ligget Group, Inc., 945 So.2d 1246 (Fla. 2006). The Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of th

rict Court, Southern District of Florida Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Robert D. Critton, Esq. Isidro Manual Garcia Innle ' Katherine Warthen ell Michael James Pike Paul G Cassell Richard Horace Willits Robert C. Josefsberg Adam D. Horowitz Stuart S Mermelstein William J. Realer 11 EFTA00182843 Case 5:0