Epstein Secrets

ilege, the defendant faces certain loss of the civil proceeding on summary judgment if the civil proceeding were to continue. Lot 5, 23 F.3d at 364; Pervis v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co., 901 F.2d 944 (11th Cir. 1990). Under this standard, Movants must show that invocation of the privilege in the inst

matter will result in certain loss by automatic summary judgment. United States v. Two Parcels of Real Property, 92 F.3d 1123, 1129 (11th Cir. 1996); Pervis, 901 F.2d at 946-47. This must be an actual adverse judgment, and not “merely the loss of the defendant’s most ‘effective defense.’” Securities & Ex

______________________/ C.M.A., CASE NO.: 08-CV-80811-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. ____________________________________/ JANE DOE, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80893-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN et al, Defendants. ____________________________________/ Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM

ry judgment." See generally, F.T.C., supra, at fn.4, citing United States v. Premises Located at Route 13. 946 F.2d 749, 756 (11th Cir.1991) (citing Pervis v. State Farm and Cas. Co., 901 F.2d 944, 948 (11th Cir.1990)). See also S.E.C. v. Keith Group of Companies. Inc., 1998 WL 1670405 (S.D. Fla. 1998)

l recording or other audio or video depiction or image of the Palm Beach Residence. Request No. 8. All documents referring or relating to Plaintiff Jane Doe No. 2, including without limitation, web pages, social networking site pages, correspondence, videotapes and audiotapes. Request No. 9. (Not at is

ceeding were to continue. Lot 5, 23 F.3d at 364; Pervis v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co., 901 F.2d 944 (

Defendant. ____________________________________/ JANE DOE, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80893-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff,

tter will result in certain loss by automatic summary judgment. United States v. Two Parcels of Real Property, 92 F.3d 1123, 1129 (1Ith Cir. 1996); Pervis, 901 F.2d at 946-47. This must be an actual adverse judgment, and not "merely the loss of the defendant's most 'effective defense.'" Securities & E

993-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. CASE NO.: 08-CV-80811-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN et al, Defendants. CASE NO.: 08-CV-80893-MARRA/JOHNSON -2- EFTA00602054 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 121

ant faces certain EFTA00213026 loss of the civil proceeding on summary judgment if the civil proceeding were to continue. Lot 5 , 23 F.3d at 364; Pervis v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. , 901 F.2d 944 (11th Cir. 1990). Under this standard, Movants must show that invocation of the privilege in the i

N Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. / C.M.A., CASE NO.: 08-CV-80811-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. I JANE DOE, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80893-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN et al, EFTA00213024 Defendants. / DOE II, CASE NO.: 09-CV-80469-MARRA/J

mary judgment." See generally, F.T.C. supra, at fn.4, citing United States v. Premises Located at Route 13 946 F.2d 749, 756 (11th Cir.1991) (citing Pervis v. State Farm and Cas. Co., 901 F.2d 944, 948 (11th Cir.1990)). See also S.E.C. v. Keith Group of Companies, Inc. 1998 WL 1670405 (S.D. Fla. 1998)(

ing these protections meaningless in attempting EFTA00222075 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 63 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/25/2009 Page 2 of 37 Jane Doe No. 2 v. Epstein Page 2 to assert and argue the factual basis for the additional objections and privileges. See part ILA. herein. I. Defendant E

matter will result in certain loss by automatic summary judgment. United Stalest Two Parcels of Real Property, 92 F.3d 1123, 1129 (11th Cir. 1996); Pervis, 901 F.2d at 946-47. This must be an actual adverse judgment, and not "merely the loss of the defendant's most `effective defense.' Securities & Ex

/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. C.M.A., Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. CASE NO.: 08-CV-80811-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80893-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN et al, Defendants. -2- EFTA00222206 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 121

matter will result in certain loss by automatic summary judgment. United Stalest Two Parcels of Real Property, 92 F.3d 1123, 1129 (11th Cir. 1996); Pervis, 901 F.2d at 946-47. This must be an actual adverse judgment, and not "merely the loss of the defendant's most `effective defense.' Securities & Ex

/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. C.M.A., Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. CASE NO.: 08-CV-80811-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80893-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN et al, Defendants. -2- EFTA00222762 DOE II, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPS

atter will result in certain loss by automatic summary judgment. United States'. Two Parcels of Real Property, 92 F.3d 1123, 1129 (11th Cir. 1996); Pervis, 901 F.2d at 946-47. This must be an actual adverse judgment, and not "merely the loss of the defendant's most `effective defense."' Securities & E

ROWITZ: Adam Horowitz, counsel for plaintiffs Jane 2 through Jane Doe 7. THE COURT: Good morning. MR. EDWARDS: Brad Edwards, counsel for plaintiff Jane Doe. THE COURT: Good morning. MR. : Good morning, Your Honor. Sid for Jane Doe II. THE COURT: Good morning. MR. WILLITS: Good morning, Your Honor