Epstein Secrets

cess to the deposition materials at issue in this case than to the summary judgment materials we ordered unsealed in Brown v. Atwavehc 929 F.3d 41 (2d Cir. 2019), and that her interests outweigh the public's interests. We assume the parties' familiarity with the underlying facts, the procedural history

iy) Boies Schiller Flexner LLP, Armonk, NY. ADAM MUELLER (Ty Gee, on the brief] Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C., Denver, CO. CHRISTINE N. WALz (Sanford L. Bohrer, on the brief) Holland & Knight LLP, New York, NY, for Intervenors Julie Brown and Miami Honk/ Media Compaig. Appeal from an order of the United

rotected by the Protective Order outweighs any public interest in their publication." (Id., at 9.) Messrs. Dershowitz and Cemovich both appealed to the Second Circuit. (ECF Nos. 500 and 915.) TheaAppeals are currently pending. On May 24, 2016, Plaintiff and Defendant entered into a settlement agreement. Now, the

all sealed or redacted docket entries should be granted. Dated: April 6, 2018 Respectfully Submitted, /s Christine N. Walz HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP Sanford L. Bohrer Christine N. Walz 31 West 52nd Street New York, NY 10019 Telephone: 212.513.3200 Fax: 212.385.9010 Attorneys for Movantsfintervenors Julie Bro

hat the district court (or Ms. Maxwell or Ms. M) unjustifiably delayed public access to the summary judgment papers. This is incorrect. In Lugosch the Second Circuit was understandably impatient with the district court's delay in acting on two newspapers' motion to intervene to unseal the summary judgment filing

[email protected]) (via United States mail) Christine N. Walz ([email protected]) Madelaine J. Harrington ([email protected]) Sanford L. Bohrer ([email protected]) Andrew G. Celli ([email protected]) David Lebowitz ([email protected]) Jay M. Wolman ([email protected]) s/ Nico

rivacy interests of non- parties ... represents a legitimate basis for sealing judicial documents"). B. Effect of Previous Unsealing of Documents by Second Circuit Plaintiff claims that if a document is already public in another context, then it should be unsealed. She cites no law for this proposition, which

FL 33301 Bradley J. Edwards Stan J. Pottinger EDWARDS POTTINGER LLC 425 North Andrews Ave., Ste. 2 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 Christine N. Walz Sanford L. Bohrer Cynthia A. Gierhart HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP 31 West 52' Street New York, NY 10019 Nicholas J. Lewin Paul M. Krieger ICRIEGER KIM & LEWIN, LLP 50

axwell, Defendant. Case No.: 15-cv-07433-RWS INTERVENORS' JULIE BROWN AND MIAMI HERALD MEDIA CO.'S RESPONSE TO MAXWELL'S OBJECTIONS TO UNSEALING Sanford L. Bohrer Christine N. Walz 31 West 52nd Street New York, NY 10019 Telephone: 212.513.3200 Fax: 212.385.9010 Attorneys for Intervenors Julie Brown and M

was not valid, as implemented. See Brown v. Maxwell, 929 F.3d 41 (2d. Cir. 2019). Therefore, Martindell is not applicable. Further, in later cases, the Second Circuit limited Martindell's ruling to cases involving documents that were not "judicial documents" subject to a presumption of access. See United States v.