Epstein Secrets

ties. Defendant also asserts without support or explanation that “confusion will result and motions in limine will undoubtedly be filed. . . .” In Ramsay v. Broward County Sheriff’s Office, 303 Fed. Appx. 761, 2008 WL 5237162 (11th Cir. 2008), the Court affirmed the District

F FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPS

ing whether to consolidate actions, we have instructed that district courts should consider whether doing so could lead to prejudice or confusion.” Ramsay v. Broward County Sheriff’s Office, 2008 WL 5237162 *3 (11th Cir. 2008). The common and overlapping issues in this case, both factual and legal,

t the Defendant sexually assaulted the plaintiff when she was a minor. This Motion is prompted by the Defendant’s efforts to take the deposition of Jane Doe No. 3 as a witness in this case. Defendant, however, does not at this time seek to take Jane Doe No. 3’s deposition in her own case. The Defendan

1, and Weatherill was elected unopposed as his successor-149i Rann resigned from parliament on 1,3 January 2012 which created an 11 Februar142O1.24 Ramsay* by-election. Zoe Bettison easily retained the seat for Labor with only a slight swing against her, and A Ramsay remained the safest of tabar's low

1 Victims' rights: Jane Does v. United States (2014) A December 30, 2014, federal civd suit was filed in Florida by Jane Doe i (Courtney Wild) and Jane Doe 2 against the United States for violations of the Crime Victims' Rights Act by the U.S. Department of Justice's NPA with Epstein and his limited 2008

ding whether to consolidate actions, we have instructed that district courts should consider whether doing so could lead to prejudice or confusion." Ramsay'. Broward County Sheriff's Office, 2008 WL 5237162 *3 (11th Cir. 2008). The common and overlapping issues in this case, both factual and legal, are

OSITION OF JANE DOE NO. 3, MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE CASES FOR PURPOSES OF DISCOVERY, AND INCORPORATED MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT Non-party witness, Jane Doe No. 3, by and through undersigned counsel, files this Motion for Protective Order and to Quash Subpoena for Deposition of Jane Doe No. 3, Motion to

arties. Defendant also asserts without support or explanation that "confusion will result and motions in limine will undoubtedly be filed. . . ." In Ramsay,. Broward County Sheriff's Office, 303 Fed. Appx. 761, 2008 WL 5237162 (11th Cir. 2008), the Court affirmed the District ' In a case relied upon by

OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defend

ilkiee.:OF PAUL GARDNER. QUEENSLAND . • • Service SA Report - Officer Leong - TELCO - Connected to Federal Government, Kadina and Port Pirie Row2n Ramsay involving multiple counts of Criminal activity and involving Queensland and the identity theft, money laundering and fraudulent activity, including

t:es vich:t.tas of the Crime Viefand !. ights Act by the U.S. DopErszont NFA Eptdeirt aria his itrai‘d 2c061 "Incl.ei was a kW " nuanci alul (Jaue Doe s) and esofasr 11.13n72. (35n3 4) plain -dile to that caseW3 The ashlifion accused Alms Dershowitz of sarually abusing a minor, Jane Doe 3, provid