Epstein Secrets

ties. Defendant also asserts without support or explanation that “confusion will result and motions in limine will undoubtedly be filed. . . .” In Ramsay v. Broward County Sheriff’s Office, 303 Fed. Appx. 761, 2008 WL 5237162 (11th Cir. 2008), the Court affirmed the District

rmelstein - 5 - Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 85 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/27/2009 Page 5 of 6 SERVICE LIST DOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. [email protected] Robert D. Critton, Esq. [email protected]

ding whether to consolidate actions, we have instructed that district courts should consider whether doing so could lead to prejudice or confusion." Ramsay'. Broward County Sheriff's Office, 2008 WL 5237162 *3 (11th Cir. 2008). The common and overlapping issues in this case, both factual and legal, are

- 9 - EFTA00221684 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 66 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/26/2009 Page 10 of 10 SERVICE LIST DOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Jack Alan Goldberger. Esq. [email protected] Robert D. Critton, Esq. [email protected] /s/ Stuart S. Mermel

arties. Defendant also asserts without support or explanation that "confusion will result and motions in limine will undoubtedly be filed. . . ." In Ramsay,. Broward County Sheriff's Office, 303 Fed. Appx. 761, 2008 WL 5237162 (11th Cir. 2008), the Court affirmed the District ' In a case relied upon by

ein - 5 - EFTA00221736 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 85 Entered on FLSD Docket 0427'2009 Page 6 of 6 SERVICE LIST DOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Robert D. Critton, Esq. s/ Stuart S. Mermelstein - 6 - EFTA00221737