Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
at Rule 412 is merely an evidentiary rule that should be disregarded in discovery disputes has been routinely rejected in federal courts. See, e.g., Barta v. City and County of Honolulu, 169 F.R.D. 132 (D. Haw. 1996) (granting protective order pursuant to Rule 412 to prevent a sexual battery and haras
Page 4 of 10 Industries, Inc., 2007 WL 2781211 (N.D. Fla. Sept. 19, 2007); Gibbons v. Food Lion, Inc., 1999 WL 33226474 (M.D. Fla. Feb. 19, 1999); P.J. Herchenroeder v. John Hopkins Univ. Applied Physical Lab, 171 F.RD. 179 (D. Md. 1997) (looking at both Rule 26 and Rule 412 in resolving discovery motion); Sanch
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
at Rule 412 is merely an evidentiary rule that should be disregarded in discovery disputes has been routinely rejected in federal courts. See, e.g., Barta v. City and County of Honolulu, 169 F.R.D. 132 (D. Haw. 1996) (granting protective order pursuant to Rule 412 to prevent a sexual battery and haras
on v. Eastern Industries, Inc., 2007 WL 2781211 (N.D. Fla. Sept. 19, 2007); Gibbons v. Food Lion, Inc., 1999 WL 33226474 (M.D. Fla. Feb. 19, 1999); P.J. Herchenroeder v. John Hopkins Univ. Applied Physical Lab, 171 F.RD. 179 (D. Md. 1997) (looking at both Rule 26 and Rule 412 in resolving discovery motion); Sanche
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
port of her position that Rule 412 prevents the discovery of Plaintiff’s sexual activities, Plaintiff cites to a string of employment related cases, Barta v. City and County of Honolulu, 169 F.R.D. 132 (D. Haw. 1996); Herron v. Eastern Industries, Inc., 2007 WL 2781211 (N.D. Fla. Sept. 19, 2007); Gibbon
rron v. Eastern Industries, Inc., 2007 WL 2781211 (N.D. Fla. Sept. 19, 2007); Gibbons v. Food Lion, Inc., 1999 WL 33226474 (M.D. Fla. Feb. 19, 1999); P.J. Herchenroeder v. John Hopkins Univ. Applied Physical Lab, 171 F.R.D. 179 (D. Mad. 1997); Sanchez v. Zabihi, 166 F.R.D. 500 (D. N.M. 1996); and Stalnaker v. Kmart C
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
areas which will clearly fail to satisfy the balancing test" set forth in Rule 412. See Barta I. City and County of Honolulu, 169 F.R.D. at 135. In Barta, the Court confronted this issue in the context of a discovery motion in a civil case. 169 F.R.D. at 133. A former employee brought a sexual harassm
Herron,. Eastern Industries. Inc. 2007 WL 2781211 (N.D. Fla. Sept. 19, 2007); Gibbons'. Food Lion Inc. 1999 WL 33226474 (M.D. Fla. Feb. 19, 1999); P.J. Herchenroeder I John Hopkins Univ. Applied Physical Lab 171 F.RD. 179 (D. Md. 1997) (looking at both Rule 26 and Rule 412 in resolving discovery motion); Sanchez
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (25)
Entities connected to both Barta and P.J. Herchenroeder
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON6 w/ Barta·4 w/ P.J.
HE
Herron
PERSON6 w/ Barta·4 w/ P.J.
JD
Jane Doe
PERSON6 w/ Barta·4 w/ P.J.
ST
Stalnaker
PERSON5 w/ Barta·4 w/ P.J.
BA
Balas
PERSON5 w/ Barta·4 w/ P.J.
GI
Gibbons
PERSON5 w/ Barta·4 w/ P.J.
Oliver Stone
PERSON5 w/ Barta·3 w/ P.J.
SA
Sanchez
PERSON5 w/ Barta·3 w/ P.J.
RC
Robert D. Critton
PERSON5 w/ Barta·3 w/ P.J.
JG
Jack Goldberger
PERSON5 w/ Barta·3 w/ P.J.
ZA
Zabihi
PERSON5 w/ Barta·3 w/ P.J.
D. Haw.
ORGANIZATION4 w/ Barta·3 w/ P.J.
Honolulu
LOCATION4 w/ Barta·3 w/ P.J.
Jacobs
ORGANIZATION3 w/ Barta·3 w/ P.J.
United States District Court
ORGANIZATION4 w/ Barta·2 w/ P.J.
Adam D. Horowitz
PERSON4 w/ Barta·2 w/ P.J.
OR
Ordover
PERSON4 w/ Barta·2 w/ P.J.
Kenneth Marra
PERSON3 w/ Barta·2 w/ P.J.
SM
Stuart S. Mermelstein
PERSON3 w/ Barta·2 w/ P.J.
D. Kan.
LOCATION3 w/ Barta·2 w/ P.J.