s with an integrated approach to software, Internet connectivity and customization that lets us focus on our product and service offering," said Eric Stalnaker, VP of Business Development at GTXC. "By working with Enfora, we know the Xplorer® A-GPS Smart Shoe is built on a robust and highly accurate platfor

s with an integrated approach to software, Internet connectivity and customization that lets us focus on our product and service offering," said Eric Stalnaker, VP of Business Development at GTXC. "By working with Enfora, we know the Xplorer® A-GPS Smart Shoe is built on a robust and highly accurate platfor

s with an integrated approach to software, Internet connectivity and customization that lets us focus on our product and service offering," said Eric Stalnaker, VP of Business Development at GTXC. "By working with Enfora, we know the Xplorer® A-GPS Smart Shoe is built on a robust and highly accurate platform

d on FLSD Docket 05/06/2009 Page 4 of 9 - - 5 of discovery under Rule 26, the Court must remain mindful of Rule 412 and its implications); Stalnaker v. Kmart Corp., 1996 WL 397563 (D. Kan. 1996) (noting that Rule 412 “is applicable and has significance in deciding certain discovery motions”). A

t “[a]lthough the present motion arises in the context of discovery under Rule 26, the Court must remain mindful of Rule 412 and its implications); Stalnaker v. Kmart Corp., 1996 WL 397563 (D. Kan. 1996) (noting that Rule 412 “is applicable and has significance in deciding certain discovery motions”).

emain mindful of Rule 412 and its implications); Stalnaker v. Kmart Corp. 12. As the above-referenced case

; P.J. Herchenroeder v. John Hopkins Univ. Applied Physical Lab, 171 F.R.D. 179 (D. Mad. 1997); Sanchez v. Zabihi, 166 F.R.D. 500 (D. N.M. 1996); and Stalnaker v. Kmart Corp., 1996 WL 397563 (D. Kan 1996). Plaintiff’s reliance on these cases in support of her position, however, is misplaced in that each of

ent 93 Entered on FLSD Docket 05'06/2009 Page 5 of 9 of discovery under Rule 26, the Court must remain mindful of Rule 412 and its implications); Stalnaker ICmart Corp. 1996 WL 397563 (D. Kan. 1996) (noting that Rule 412 "is applicable and has significance in deciding certain discovery motions"). As t