Epstein Secrets

burden of showing that the requested information is not relevant to the issues in the case is on the party resisting discovery") citation omitted); Gober v. City of Lees berg, 197 F .R.D. 519, 521 (M.D. Fla. 2000)("The party resisting production of information bears the burden of establishing lack of

2 F.R.D. 685 (S.D. Fla. 2007). See Hickman v. Taylor, 329 U.S. 495, 507-08 (1947); Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. Sanders, 437 U.S. 340, 351 (1978). In Oppenheimer, the Supreme Court discussed the concept of relevance in relation to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b) and noted that: The key phrase in this definition - "rel

e burden of showing that the requested information is not relevant to the issues in the case is on the party resisting discovery”)(citation omitted); Gober v. City of Leesberg, 197 F.R.D. 519, 521 (M.D. Fla. 2000)(“The party resisting production of information bears the burden of establishing lack of rel

bear on any issue that is or may be in the case." Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. Sanders, 437 U.S. 340, 352 (1978).

he party resisting discovery”)(citation omitted); Gober v. City of Leesberg, 197 F.R.D. 519, 521 (M.D. Fl

bear on any issue that is or may be in the case." Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. Sanders, 437 U.S. 340, 352 (1978).

burden of showing that the requested information is not relevant to the issues in the case is on the party resisting discovery")(citation omitted): Gober v. City of Leesberg, 197 F.R.D. 519, 521 (M.D. Fla. 2000)("The party resisting production of information bears the burden of establishing lack of r

bear on any issue that is or may be in the case? Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. Sanders, 437 U.S. 340, 352 (1978).