Epstein Secrets

ption in favor of detention based on the crimes charged, the presumption shifts only the burden of production, not persuasion. See United States v. Martir, 782 F.2d 1141, 1144 (2d Cir. 1986). Accordingly, the statutory demand on defendants "is fairly easily met." United States v. Conway, No. 4-11-70756

ffective in meeting those goals in many prominent cases prosecuted in our Circuit, including cases against defendants as infamous as Bernie Madoff, Marc Dreier and David Brooks. To be clear, defense counsel are fully confident Mr. Epstein will appear as required without resort to this measure. And we under

s v. Esposito, 309 F. Supp. 3d 24 (S.D.N.Y. 2018); United States v. Seng, No. 15-CR-706, 2017 WL 2693625 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 23, 2015); United States v. Dreier, 596 F. Supp. 2d 831 (S.D.N.Y. 2009); United States v. Madoff, 586 F. Supp. 2d 240 (S.D.N.Y. 2009); United States v. Schlegel, No. 06-CR-550, 2008

ption in favor of detention based on the crimes charged, the presumption shifts only the burden of production, not persuasion. See United States v. Martir, 782 F.2d 1141, 1144 (2d Cir. 1986). Accordingly, the statutory demand on defendants "is fairly easily met." United States v. Conway, No. 4-11-70756

ffective in meeting those goals in many prominent cases prosecuted in our Circuit, including cases against defendants as infamous as Bernie Madoff, Marc Dreier and David Brooks. To be clear, defense counsel are fully confident Mr. Epstein will appear as required without resort to this measure. And we under

s v. Esposito, 309 F. Supp. 3d 24 (S.D.N.Y. 2018); United States v. Seng, No. 15-CR-706, 2017 WL 2693625 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 23, 2015); United States v. Dreier, 596 F. Supp. 2d 831 (S.D.N.Y. 2009); United States v. Madoff, 586 F. Supp. 2d 240 (S.D.N.Y. 2009); United States v. Schlegel, No. 06-CR-550, 2008

"remains a factor to be considered among those weighed by the district court." United States v. Mercedes, 254 F.3d 433, 436 (2d Cir. 2001) (quoting Martir, 782 F.2d at 1144). As a result, "[a] judicial officer conducting a detention hearing should, even after a defendant has come forward with rebuttal

o extradition while intending to resist any subsequent extradition that might result. The Court is unpersuaded. 13 EFTA00066968 United States v. Dreier, 596 F. Supp. 2d 831 (S.D.N.Y. 2009), and United States v. Madoff; 586 F. Supp. 2d 240 (S.D.N.Y. 2009)). The Court's concerns regarding the absence

"remains a factor to be considered among those weighed by the district court." United States v. Mercedes, 254 F.3d 433, 436 (2d Cir. 2001) (quoting Martir, 782 F.2d at 1144). As a result, "[a] judicial officer conducting a detention hearing should, even after a defendant has come forward with rebuttal

o extradition while intending to resist any subsequent extradition that might result. The Court is unpersuaded. 13 EFTA00154338 United States v. Dreier, 596 F. Supp. 2d 831 (S.D.N.Y. 2009), and United States v. Madoff; 586 F. Supp. 2d 240 (S.D.N.Y. 2009)). The Court's concerns regarding the absence

"remains a factor to be considered among those weighed by the district court." United States v. Mercedes, 254 F.3d 433, 436 (2d Cir. 2001) (quoting Martir, 782 F.2d at 1144). As a result, "[a] judicial officer conducting a detention hearing should, even after a defendant has come forward with rebuttal

o extradition while intending to resist any subsequent extradition that might result. The Court is unpersuaded. 13 EFTA00083764 United States v. Dreier, 596 F. Supp. 2d 831 (S.D.N.Y. 2009), and United States v. Madoff; 586 F. Supp. 2d 240 (S.D.N.Y. 2009)). The Court's concerns regarding the absence

"remains a factor to be considered among those weighed by the district court." United States v. Mercedes, 254 F.3d 433, 436 (2d Cir. 2001) (quoting Martir, 782 F.2d at 1144). As a result, "[a] judicial officer conducting a detention hearing should, even after a defendant has come forward with rebuttal

o extradition while intending to resist any subsequent extradition that might result. The Court is unpersuaded. 13 EFTA00086927 United States v. Dreier, 596 F. Supp. 2d 831 (S.D.N.Y. 2009), and United States v. Madoff; 586 F. Supp. 2d 240 (S.D.N.Y. 2009)). The Court's concerns regarding the absence

"remains a factor to be considered among those weighed by the district court." United States v. Mercedes, 254 F.3d 433, 436 (2d Cir. 2001) (quoting Martir, 782 F.2d at 1144). As a result, "[a] judicial officer conducting a detention hearing should, even after a defendant has come forward with rebuttal

o extradition while intending to resist any subsequent extradition that might result. The Court is unpersuaded. 13 EFTA00093438 United States v. Dreier, 596 F. Supp. 2d 831 (S.D.N.Y. 2009), and United States v. Madoff; 586 F. Supp. 2d 240 (S.D.N.Y. 2009)). The Court's concerns regarding the absence

"remains a factor to be considered among those weighed by the district court." United States v. Mercedes, 254 F.3d 433, 436 (2d Cir. 2001) (quoting Martir, 782 F.2d at 1144). As a result, "[a] judicial officer conducting a detention hearing should, even after a defendant has come forward with rebuttal

o extradition while intending to resist any subsequent extradition that might result. The Court is unpersuaded. 13 EFTA00099922 United States v. Dreier, 596 F. Supp. 2d 831 (S.D.N.Y. 2009), and United States v. Madoff; 586 F. Supp. 2d 240 (S.D.N.Y. 2009)). The Court's concerns regarding the absence

the evidence that the defendant presents a risk of flight:" English, 629 F.3d at 319 (quoting Mercedes, 254 F.3d at 436); see also United States v. Martir, 782 F.2d 1141, 1144 (2d Cir. 1986) ("The government retains the burden of persuasion tin a presumption case]."). Even when "a defendant has met hi

WL 1456536 (3d Cir. July 13, 1999) 15 United States v. Cohen, No. C 10-00547, 2010 WL 5387757 n.11 (N.D. Cal. Dec. 20, 2010) 15 United States v. Dreier, 596 F. Supp. 2d 831 (S.D.N.Y. 2009) 27 United States v. English, 629 F.3d 311 (2d Cir. 2011) 7 United States v. Epstein, 155 F. Supp. 2d 323 (E.

"remains a factor to be considered among those weighed by the district court." United States v. Mercedes, 254 F.3d 433, 436 (2d Cir. 2001) (quoting Martir, 782 F.2d at 1144). As a result, "[a] judicial officer conducting a detention hearing should, even after a defendant has come forward with rebuttal

intending to resist any subsequent extradition that might result. The Court is unpersuaded. 13 EFTA00013319 --- PAGE BREAK --- United States v. Dreier, 596 F. Supp. 2d 831 (S.D.N.Y. 2009), and United States v. Madoff 586 F. Supp. 2d 240 (S.D.N.Y. 2009)). The Court's concerns regarding the absence