Epstein Secrets

is broad, it is not without limits. Washington v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco, 959 F.2d 1566, 1570 (11th Cir. 1992). Indeed the

e theory that it might conceivably become so.’ ” Food Lion, Inc. v. United Food & Commercial Workers Intern. Union

mited the scope of disclosure or discovery to certain matters." 9. While the scope of discovery is broad, it is not without limits. Washington v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco, 959 F.2d 1566, 1570 (11th Cir. 1992). Courts have long held that while the standard of relevancy in discovery is a liberal one, it is not so libera

1 in the shadow zones of relevancy and to explore matters which does not presently appear germane on the theory that it might conceivably become so. Food Lion, Inc. v. United Food & Commercial Workers Intern. Union, 103 F.3d 1007, 1012-13 (C.A. D.C. 1997) (string cite omitted). See also Capco Properties, LLC v.

uestion, Plaintiffs' Motion as it relates to this request is denied. While the scope of discovery is broad, it is not without limits. Washington 1. Brown & Williamson Tobacco, 959 F.2d 1566, 1570 (11th Cir. 1992). Indeed the 2000 Amendment to Rule 26 has effectively limited the scope of discoverable information to those

in the shadow zones of relevancy and to explore matter which does not presently appear germane on the theory that it might conceivably become so.'" Food Lion, Inc. I. United Food & Commercial Workers Intern. Union, 103 F.3d 1007, 1012-13 (C.A. D.C. 1997)(quoting Broadway and Ninety Sixth Street Realty Cot Loew