7
Total Mentions
7
Documents
64
Connected Entities
Organization referenced in documents
ea Johnson noted in her October 28, 2009 Omnibus Order (DE #377), "[w]hile the scope of discovery is broad, it is not without limits. Washington v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco, 959 F.2d 1566, 1570 (11th Cir. 1992). . .. Cou1is have long held that ' [ w]hile the standard of relevancy [in discovery] is a liberal one, it is
udge Linnea Johnson noted in her October 28, 2009 Omnibus Order,2 "[w]hile the scope of discovery is broad, it is not without limits. Washington v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco, 959 F.2d 1566, 1570 (I Ith Cir. 1992) .... Courts have long held that '[w]hile the standard of relevancy [in discovery] is a liberal one, it is not
ea Johnson noted in her October 28, 2009 Omnibus Order (DE #377), "[w]hile the scope of discovery is broad, it is not without limits. Washington v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco, 959 F.2d 1566, 1570 (11th Cir. 1992). Indeed the 2000 Amendment to Rule 26 has effectively limited the scope of discoverable information to those
mited the scope of disclosure or discovery to certain matters." 9. While the scope of discovery is broad, it is not without limits. Washington v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco, 959 F.2d 1566, 1570 (11th Cir. 1992). Courts have long held that while the standard of relevancy in discovery is a liberal one, it is not so libera
EFTA00222428
uestion, Plaintiffs' Motion as it relates to this request is denied. While the scope of discovery is broad, it is not without limits. Washington 1. Brown & Williamson Tobacco, 959 F.2d 1566, 1570 (11th Cir. 1992). Indeed the 2000 Amendment to Rule 26 has effectively limited the scope of discoverable information to those
EFTA00728114
imited the scope of disclosure or discovery to certain matters." :_While the scope of discovery is broad, it is not without limits. Washington v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco, 959 F.2d 1566, 1570 (11th Cir. 1992). Courts have long held that while the standard of relevancy in discovery is a liberal one, it is not so libera
Jane Doe
PersonPseudonym for anonymous victims/witnesses in Epstein legal proceedings

Jeffrey Epstein
PersonAmerican sex offender and financier (1953–2019)

Adam D. Horowitz
PersonAmerican attorney specializing in sexual abuse cases, represented multiple Epstein victims

Bradley Edwards
PersonAmerican attorney who represented Epstein victims, author of Relentless Pursuit
Jack Goldberger
PersonAmerican criminal defense attorney who represented Jeffrey Epstein, partner at Goldberger Weiss P.A. in West Palm Beach, Florida
Mermelstein & Horowitz
OrganizationLaw firm (Mermelstein & Horowitz)
Isidro Manuel Garcia
PersonPerson referenced in documents

Paul Cassell
PersonUnited States federal judge
Michael J. Pike
PersonPerson referenced in Epstein-related documents

Sarah Kellen
PersonAmerican assistant to Jeffrey Epstein, named as unindicted co-conspirator in 2008 non-prosecution agreement
Robert D. Critton
PersonIndividual referenced in Epstein legal documents

Salt Lake City
LocationCity in and county seat of Salt Lake County, Utah, United States and the capital of Utah
Tanchel
PersonName reference in documents
Food Lion, Inc.
OrganizationOrganization referenced in documents

South
LocationDirectional region of the United States
Jaffe
PersonSurname reference in Epstein financial and legal documents
Linnea Johnson
PersonAmerican poet
Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss
OrganizationLaw firm based in Florida

Kenneth Marra
PersonAmerican judge
Maria Farmer
PersonAmerican visual artist