Epstein Secrets

ice of Atty. Gen., Dept. of Legal Affairs v. Tenet, 420 F.Supp.2d 1288 (S.D. Fla. 2005) (citation omitted). Both the United States Supreme Court and the Florida Supreme Court have required proof of a RICO "enterprise" that is separate and distinct from the person charged with the RICO violation. See United States v. Turk

the similarities between Florida and federal RICO acts, Florida looks to federal authority regarding the interpretation and application of its act. Palmas Y Bambu, S.A. v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours & Co., Inc., 881 So.2d 565, 570 n.1 (3s DCA 2004); see also RLS Business Ventures, Inc. v. Second Chance Wholesale,

ice of Atty. Gen., Dept. of Legal Affairs v. Tenet, 420 F.Supp.2d 1288 (S.D. Fla. 2005) (citation omitted). Both the United States Supreme Court and the Florida Supreme Court have required proof of a RICO "enterprise" that is separate and distinct from the person charged with the RICO violation. See United States v. Turk

the similarities between Florida and federal RICO acts, Florida looks to federal authority regarding the interpretation and application of its act. Palmas Y Bambu, S.A. v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours & Co., Inc., 881 So.2d 565, 570 n.1 (3rd DCA 2004); see also RLS Business Ventures, Inc. v. Second Chance Wholesale

ice of Atty. Gen., Dept. of Legal Affairs v. Tenet, 420 F.Supp.2d 1288 (S.D. Fla. 2005) (citation omitted). Both the United States Supreme Court and the Florida Supreme Court have required proof of a RICO "enterprise" that is separate and distinct from the person charged with the RICO violation. See United States v. Turk

the similarities between Florida and federal RICO acts, Florida looks to federal authority regarding the interpretation and application of its act. Palmas Y Bambu, S.A. v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours & Co., Inc., 881 So.2d 565, 570 n.1 (3rd DCA 2004); see also RLS Business Ventures, Inc. v. Second Chance Wholesale