Epstein Secrets

d 480. 6. Moreover, to the extent any of Epstein's arguments are considered "new," the Court has the discretion to entertain same. See Williams v. McNeil, 557 F.3d 1287, 1292 (I Ith Cir. 2009) (noting that "the district court aclmowledged that it had discretion to consider Williams' timeliness argume

guments in camera. See DE #480. 11. Despite Jane Doe's unsupported contention, Epstein's Motion is not an attempt to "run out the clock" and block Jane Doe from obtaining discovery, which is readily apparent from this timely reply. Instead, Epstein is merely protecting his Constitutional rights under th

re dress rehearsal if a party were allowed to feint and weave at the initial hearing, and save its knockout punch for the second round.” Williams v. McNeil, 557 F.3d 1287, 1292 (11th Cir. 2009) (quoting United States v. Howell, 231 F.3d 615, 622 (9th Cir. 2000). Thus, the District Court has discretion t

FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CIV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN,

dress rehearser if a party were allowed to feint and weave at the initial hearing, and save its knockout punch for the second round.” Williams v. McNeil, 557 F.3d 1287, 1292 (11th Cir. 2009). Four, in any event, far from being a knockout punch, Epstein’s argument is meritless. As is readily app

notice that more than 90 days had elapsed since the filing of her motion (dkt. #453). On February 4, 2010, the magistrate judge granted in part Jane Doe’s motion to compel, specifically ruling that Epstein had to produce the discovery provided to him by state and federal prosecutors, his recent tax re

540 F.3d 1253, 1262 (11th Cir. 2008) (en bane). That right attaches, for the purposes of the Sixth Amendment, when "a prosecution is commenced."? a McNeil v. Wisconsin, 501 U.S. 171, 175, III S. Ct. 2204, 2207, 115 L.Ed.2d 158 (1991). In other words, a criminal defendant is entitled to counsel "at or

30 underage girls whom he sexually abused at his mansion in Palm Beach, Florida. The victims la ded one of the initial petitioners in this case, (Jane Doe I), who was 15 years old when Epstein first sexually abused her. Following the FBI's investigation, the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern Di

at trial, 11/90 and 12/90 U.S. v. Walter Leroy Moody (Birmingham, Alabama; Atlanta, Georgia; and Savannah, Georgia) Testified at trial, 12/13/90 McNeil v. P.F.I. (New York, New York) Testified at deposition, 1/15/91 U.S. v. Keith Gordon Ham, et al. (Wheeling, West Virginia) Testified at trial, 3/1

k, New York) [2nd Circuit Opinion: 938 F.2d 1535 (2nd Cir. 1991)] Testified at deposition, 5/13/90 Testified in court (trial or hearing), 5/14/90 Jane Doe v. Stuart Brown. M.D. (San Diego, California) Testified by deposition, 6/6/90 Carin Evans vs. Richard Benton, Ph.D. (Houston, Texas) Testified at