Epstein Secrets

P. 42(a); United States v. Baldwin, 770 F.2d 1550, 1553 (11th Cir. 1985). The procedures for such nonsummary criminal contempt are well settled. As the Eleventh Circuit has explained, "A federal court may punish contemptuous conduct that occurs outside its presence only after giving notice of the essential facts co

to the Clerk is on fife). In accordance with Local Rule 3.7, the Honorable was randomly drawn from the Emergency Wheel. Dated this day of . 20 STEVEN M. LARIMORE Court Administrator • Clerk of Court By: . Deputy Clerk EFTA00728810

JPL/slm Decisions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Filth Circuit handed down prior to September 30, 1981, are binding as precedent in the Eleventh Circuit. $.0 Bonner v. City of Prichard, Ala , 661 F.2d 1206, 1207 (11th Cir. 1981). K&E 19439748.2 EFTA00180297 Rov BLACK HOWARD M. SREBNICK Scorer A

04-Civ-MARRA/JOHNSON CASE NO.: JANE DOE, a/k/a JANE DOE #1, Plaintiff, Vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN and Defendants. NOTICE OF REMOVAL July 18, 2008 STEVEN M. LARIMORE CLERK U.S. DISE. CI. 5.D. OF FLA. • MIAMI In accordance with 28 U.S.C. §§ 1441, 1446, and 1332(a)(1), the defendants, Jeffrey Epstein, and , he

1141 (Palm Beach Co. Family Ct.) (1/31/08). If this turns out to be the case, there is complete diversity, regardless ofillin citizenship. Although the Eleventh Circuit has recently indicated that a district court may not conduct jurisdictional discovery under such circumstances, another division of this Court has

04-Civ-MARRA/JOHNSON CASE NO.: JANE DOE, a/k/a JANE DOE N1, Plaintiff, Vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN and Defendants. NOTICE OF REMOVAL July 18, 2008 STEVEN M. LARIMORE CLERK U.S. GIST. CT. S.D. OF FLA. • MIAMI In accordance with 28 U.S.C. §§ 1441, 1446, and 1332(a)(1), the defendants, Jeffrey Epstein, , and he

009 WL 2567831, fn. I (E.D. Cal. Aug. 18, 2009). U.S.' Zane, 2009 WL 2567832, fn.l (E.D. Cal. Aug. 18 2009). As to the meaning of "actual damages," the Eleventh Circuit in McMillian i t F.D.I.C., 81 F.3d 1041, 1055 (I I th Cir.1996)3, succinctly explained: 3 In McMillian the I 1th Circuit was faced with the task of

UTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Civil Action No. 10-80309 JANE DOE No. 103, Plaintiff, I JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. FILED byjaD C FEB 2 3 2010 STEVEN M. LARIMORE CLERK IJ S 01ST CT 8. C. of FI.A. - MIAMI COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 103 ("Plaintiff'), brings this Complaint ag

njoin the stay. And we conclude that this provision does not violate separation of powers principles.") (emphasis added). One District Court within the Eleventh Circuit recently construed "the plain language of § 3509(k)" as "requirfing/ a stay in a case . . . where . . . a parallel criminal action [is] pending." D

41 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-80811-CIV-ZLOCH/SNOW FILED UNDER SEAL' S FILED b D.C. JUL 2 5 2008 STEVEN M. LARIMORE CLERK U.S. O191 CT F 1 FREY EPSTEIN AND MOTION FOR STAY ' This motion is filed under seal because the deferred- rosecution agreement between t