3
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
3 / 3
Mentions
nary, hazards of incrimination.” United States v. Apfelbaum, 445 U.S. 115, 128 (1980). When the Fifth Amendme
s or to produce documents is improper. Anglada v. Sprague, 822 F.2d 1035, 1037 (11th Cir. 1987). Instead,
17)). “The claimant must be ‘confronted by substantial and ‘real,’ and not merely trifling or imaginary, hazards of incrimination.” United States v. Apfelbaum, 445 U.S. 115, 128 (1980). When the Fifth Amendment privilege is raised as a bar to discovery, a blanket refusal to answer questions or to produce do
the Fifth Amendment privilege is raised as a bar to discovery, a blanket refusal to answer questions or to produce documents is improper. Anglada v. Sprague, 822 F.2d 1035, 1037 (11th Cir. 1987). Instead, the privilege must be asserted in response to a particular question, and in each instance the burden
nary, hazards of incrimination.” United States v. Apfelbaum, 445 U.S. 115, 128 (1980). When the Fifth Amendme
s or to produce documents is improper. Anglada v. Sprague, 822 F.2d 1035, 1037 (11th Cir. 1987). Instead,
Entities connected to both Apfelbaum and Sprague

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSONJane Doe
PERSONHubbell
PERSON
Jay Lefkowitz
PERSON
Edwin
PERSONTurley
PERSON
Kenneth Marra
PERSONJack Goldberger
PERSON
Adam D. Horowitz
PERSON
Sarah Kellen
PERSONGoodwin
PERSON
Bradley Edwards
PERSON
Rudy Giuliani
PERSONAnglada
PERSONGlanzer
PERSONMorganroth
PERSONMermelstein & Horowitz
ORGANIZATIONSecond Circuit
ORGANIZATION
Bernie Sanders
PERSONStuart S. Mermelstein
PERSON