Epstein Secrets

Child Exploration Statutes in Tide 18 10/19/2006 Subpoena to Individual #28 (return date 10/27/06) 10/24/2006 Email chain between Villafafia and Jim Eisenberg discussing Individual #28 1) 10/30/2006 Villafatia Guy Lewis Email re representation of Jeffrey Epstein I 10/31/2006 Villafaria Guy Lewis Em

and jury subpoena to victim/witness, revisions to indictment, planned grand jury presentation, and plans to supersede indictment B 13; 6/23/2008 DAG Filip completes review of Epstein's appeal 6/23/2008 6/23/2008-6/26/2008 Emits between Marie Villafana and grand jury witness regarding immunity and tra

cted Epstein when she received the letter and subpoena; Epstein put her in touch with his attorney, Jack Goldberger; and Goldberger had his friend, Jim Eisenberg, serve as Individual #28's lawyer while Epstein paid Eisenberg's fees. Individual #28 later told Brad Edwards that someone (Epstein, Goldberger, or

if he wishes." (Exhibit B-19.) Although I did not know it at the time, in preparing this response, I noticed that, in FAUSA June 3, 2008 letter to DAG Filip, he stated that the quoted language was proposed by USA Acosta "in consultation with DAAG ." (Exhibit B-123 at 7.) On December 21, 2007, attorney

ctims with notice of state change of plea hearing. 13-20 19/11/2007 Email from Marie Villafana toJeff Sloman and Alex Acosta regarding call with Jim Eisenberg 13.21 12/21/2007 Letter from Jay Lefkowitz to Alex Acosta re wanting to sec victim list B.22 12/26/2007 Letter from Jay Lelkowitz. to Alex Acost

nd jury subpoena to victim/witness, revisions to indictment, planned grand jury presentation, and plans to supersede indictment IS Ill 6/23/2008 DAG Filip completes review of Epstein's appeal 6/23/2008 6/23/2008-6/26/2008 Emails between Marie Villafaiia and grand jury witne, regarding immunity and tra

send. (Exhibit B-14). At 5:08 pm, I received an email from Jeff Sloman that said, "Hold the letter" (Exhibit B-54). On December 10 007, I contacted Jim Eisenberg, counsel for Individual # 28, who is Jane Doe #2 in the Jane Doe I United States suit. As noted on the attached chart, Mr. Eisenberg was paid for

shes." (Exhibit B-19.) Although I did not know it at the time, in preparing this response, I noticed that, in FAUSA Sloman's June 3, 2008 letter to DAG Filip, he stated that the quoted language was proposed by USA Acosta "in consultation with DAAG Mandelker." (Exhibit B-123 at 7.) On December 21, 2007, a