Epstein Secrets

olicy issues raised by your Office's invocation of § 2255. It is common ground among us that § 2255 has not been the subject of policy guidance from Main Justice, over the long life of this unusual statute. It is therefore undisputed that we are sailing in uncharted jurisprudential and policy waters. This sh

of differing constructions,' due process requires a strict construction of the language in the defendant's favor under the rule of lenity") (citing F. Stat. § 6 As we have made clear throughout this investigation, the alleged conduct does not implicate over-arching federal interests because the conduc

olicy issues raised by your Otrice's invocation of * 2255. It is common ground among us that § 2255 has not been the subject of policy guidance from Main Justice. over the long life of this unusual statute. It is therefore undisputed that we un sailing in uncharted jurisprudential and policy waters. This sho

of differing constructions.' due process requires a strict construction of the language in the defendant's favor under the rule of lenity") (citing F. Stat. 775.021(1) (1995); Perkins v. State. 576 80.2d 1310. 1312 (Fla. 1991): Logan v. State, 666 So.2d 260.261 (Flu. 4th DCA 1996)). • Plain Meatninzt

y issues raised by your Office's invocation of § 2255. It is co m mon ground among us that Si 2255 has not been the subject or policy guidance front Main Justice. over the long life of this unusual statute. It is therefore undisputed that we are sailing in uncharted jurisprudential and policy waters. This sh

of differing constructions.' due pn'ccss requires a strict construction of the language in the defendant's favor under the rule of lenity") (riling F. Stat. 775.021( I ) (1995): Perkins it State, 576 So.2d 1310. 1312 (Fla. 1991): Logan it State, 666 So.2d 260. 261 (Fla. 4th ocA 1996)). • Plain Meaning