Epstein Secrets

OF GERALD B. LEFCOURT, P.C. • PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION I AS EAST 7S" STREET NEW YORE. NEW YORK WOE IL GERALD G. LEFCOURT leicouleNtwurtlarzwn SHERYL E. REICH fOCROIRICOURRIP.COM RENATO C. STABILE SiblOSWCOURISW.0:en FAITH A. FRIEDMAN ffriedinarylletcouttlaNcom BY HAND Matthew Menchel, Esq. Chief of

k for him as a prostitute. Challenged application of federal statute to purely local activity. Court affirmed. 1591; 2422(b) Consummated U.S. I Strevell, 185 Fed. Appx. 841 (11' Cir. 2006) Unpublished Foreign Travel Sting Several telephone conversations arranging for travel to Costa Rica for se

GE:R.Axn B. LEECOURT, P.C. A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 140 EAST 701^ STREET NEW YORE, NEW YORE 100E1 GERALD S. LEFCOuRT lefccuradercourtlaw.com SHERYL E. REICH INEVIMEOURMW.ccen RENATO C. STABILE 11104110WONSEinvcom FAITH A. FRIEDMAN filedmeneldwurlaw.wco BY HAND DELIVERY June 25, 2007 Jeffrey Sloman

intervention a high priority. See, e.g., United States 'Clarke, 159 Fed. Appx. 128, 2005 WL 3438434 (It ch Cir. 2005)(unpublished); United States I Strevell, 185 Fed. Appx. 841, 2005 WL 1697529 (11th Cir. 2006)(unpublished), cert. denied, 127 U.S. 692 (2006). No such federal interest is implicated in th

LAw 0.74=1 or GERALD B. Lnrcounr, P.C. A PROFeSSIONAL CORPORATION 1493 CAST TB" STREET NEW YORE, NEW YORK 10021 GERALD B LEFCOURT SHERYL E. REICH riBlialloROWEWN:orn RENATO C. STABILE altRINBIeBoustar tom rainy BY HAND Chief of the Criminal Division The United States Attorney's Office S

for him as a prostitute. Challenged application of federal statute to purely local activity. Court affirmed. 1591; 2422(6) Consummated U.S. v. Strevell, 185 Fed. Appx. 841 (I I th Cir. 2006) Unpublished Foreign Travel Sting Several telephone conversations arranging for travel to Costa Rica for

00230209 LAW OFFICES OF Gmateam B. Drecotrin, P.G. A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION IPS EAST 70' STREET NEW YORE, NEW YORIELOOEI GERALD B. LEFCOURT SHERYL E. REICH FAITH A. FRIEDMAN June 25, 2007 BY HAND DELIVERY Esq., First Assistant United States Attorney Esq., Chief, Criminal Division The United States

ntervention a high priority. See, e.g., United States v. Clarke, 159 Fed. Appx. 128, 2005 WL 3438434 (11th Cir. 2005)(unpublished); United States v. Strevell, 185 Fed. Appx. 841, 2005 WI, 1697529 (11th Cir. 2006)(unpublished), cert. denied, 127 U.S. 692 (2006). No such federal interest is implicated in t