Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
s true in general is not true in the particular case ... '" United States v. Dominguez, 783 F.2d 702, 707 (7th Cir. 1986) (quoting United States v. Jessup, 757 F.2d 378, 384 (1st Cir.1985)). "The quantum of evidence required to rebut the presumption is not high." United States v. Thompson, No. 16-CR-00
dant spent only 22 days in the United States, that the charges against the defendant (violations of International Emergency Economic Powers Act and the Export Administration Regulations) "were serious and carried a potential for a significant period of incarceration" and that the "government has strong evidence against" the defenda
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
s true in general is not true in the particular case ... '" United States v. Dominguez, 783 F.2d 702, 707 (7th Cir. 1986) (quoting United States v. Jessup, 757 F.2d 378, 384 (1st Cir.1985)). "The quantum of evidence required to rebut the presumption is not high." United States v. Thompson, No. 16-CR-00
dant spent only 22 days in the United States, that the charges against the defendant (violations of International Emergency Economic Powers Act and the Export Administration Regulations) "were serious and carried a potential for a significant period of incarceration" and that the "government has strong evidence against" the defenda
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
s true in general is not true in the particular case ... '" United States v. Dominguez, 783 F.2d 702, 707 (7th Cir. 1986) (quoting United States v. Jessup, 757 F.2d 378, 384 (1st Cir.1985)). "The quantum of evidence required to rebut the presumption is not high." United States v. Thompson, No. 16-CR-00
dant spent only 22 days in the United States, that the charges against the defendant (violations of International Emergency Economic Powers Act and the Export Administration Regulations) "were serious and carried a potential for a significant period of incarceration" and that the "government has strong evidence against" the defenda
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
s true in general is not true in the particular case ... '" United States v. Dominguez, 783 F.2d 702, 707 (7th Cir. 1986) (quoting United States v. Jessup, 757 F.2d 378, 384 (1st Cir.1985)). "The quantum of evidence required to rebut the presumption is not high." United States v. Thompson, No. 16-CR-00
dant spent only 22 days in the United States, that the charges against the defendant (violations of International Emergency Economic Powers Act and the Export Administration Regulations) "were serious and carried a potential for a significant period of incarceration" and that the "government has strong evidence against" the defenda
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (126)
Entities connected to both Jessup and the Export Administration Regulations
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON17 w/ Jessup·6 w/ the
United States
LOCATION13 w/ Jessup·6 w/ the
Bernie Madoff
PERSON13 w/ Jessup·4 w/ the
KA
Karni
PERSON12 w/ Jessup·4 w/ the
MD
Marc Dreier
PERSON12 w/ Jessup·4 w/ the
Second Circuit
ORGANIZATION12 w/ Jessup·4 w/ the
Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATION11 w/ Jessup·4 w/ the
the Southern District
LOCATION11 w/ Jessup·4 w/ the
MA
Martir
PERSON10 w/ Jessup·2 w/ the
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION7 w/ Jessup·5 w/ the
New York
LOCATION6 w/ Jessup·5 w/ the
Bernie Sanders
PERSON6 w/ Jessup·4 w/ the
Marc Rich
PERSON5 w/ Jessup·5 w/ the
ET
Emmy Taylor
PERSON5 w/ Jessup·5 w/ the
Pretrial Services
ORGANIZATION5 w/ Jessup·4 w/ the
Denmark
LOCATION5 w/ Jessup·4 w/ the
George Mitchell
PERSON5 w/ Jessup·4 w/ the
Geoffrey S. Berman
PERSON5 w/ Jessup·4 w/ the
EV
Evans
PERSON5 w/ Jessup·4 w/ the
Hanson
PERSON5 w/ Jessup·4 w/ the