Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
s true in general is not true in the particular case ... '" United States v. Dominguez, 783 F.2d 702, 707 (7th Cir. 1986) (quoting United States v. Jessup, 757 F.2d 378, 384 (1st Cir.1985)). "The quantum of evidence required to rebut the presumption is not high." United States v. Thompson, No. 16-CR-00
e 18 years preceding his arrest when he landed in Colorado for a family ski trip based on allegations he violated the Export Administration Act and the International Economic Emergency Powers Act by acquiring products capable of triggering nuclear weapons and exported them to Pakistan, despite defendant's lack of any ties to the U
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
s true in general is not true in the particular case ... '" United States v. Dominguez, 783 F.2d 702, 707 (7th Cir. 1986) (quoting United States v. Jessup, 757 F.2d 378, 384 (1st Cir.1985)). "The quantum of evidence required to rebut the presumption is not high." United States v. Thompson, No. 16-CR-00
e 18 years preceding his arrest when he landed in Colorado for a family ski trip based on allegations he violated the Export Administration Act and the International Economic Emergency Powers Act by acquiring products capable of triggering nuclear weapons and exported them to Pakistan, despite defendant's lack of any ties to the U
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
s true in general is not true in the particular case ... '" United States v. Dominguez, 783 F.2d 702, 707 (7th Cir. 1986) (quoting United States v. Jessup, 757 F.2d 378, 384 (1st Cir.1985)). "The quantum of evidence required to rebut the presumption is not high." United States v. Thompson, No. 16-CR-00
e 18 years preceding his arrest when he landed in Colorado for a family ski trip based on allegations he violated the Export Administration Act and the International Economic Emergency Powers Act by acquiring products capable of triggering nuclear weapons and exported them to Pakistan, despite defendant's lack of any ties to the U
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
s true in general is not true in the particular case ... '" United States v. Dominguez, 783 F.2d 702, 707 (7th Cir. 1986) (quoting United States v. Jessup, 757 F.2d 378, 384 (1st Cir.1985)). "The quantum of evidence required to rebut the presumption is not high." United States v. Thompson, No. 16-CR-00
e 18 years preceding his arrest when he landed in Colorado for a family ski trip based on allegations he violated the Export Administration Act and the International Economic Emergency Powers Act by acquiring products capable of triggering nuclear weapons and exported them to Pakistan, despite defendant's lack of any ties to the U
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (126)
Entities connected to both Jessup and the International Economic Emergency
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON17 w/ Jessup·4 w/ the
United States
LOCATION13 w/ Jessup·4 w/ the
Bernie Madoff
PERSON13 w/ Jessup·4 w/ the
KA
Karni
PERSON12 w/ Jessup·4 w/ the
Second Circuit
ORGANIZATION12 w/ Jessup·4 w/ the
MD
Marc Dreier
PERSON12 w/ Jessup·4 w/ the
Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATION11 w/ Jessup·4 w/ the
the Southern District
LOCATION11 w/ Jessup·4 w/ the
MA
Martir
PERSON10 w/ Jessup·2 w/ the
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION7 w/ Jessup·4 w/ the
Bernie Sanders
PERSON6 w/ Jessup·4 w/ the
New York
LOCATION6 w/ Jessup·4 w/ the
Pretrial Services
ORGANIZATION5 w/ Jessup·4 w/ the
ET
Emmy Taylor
PERSON5 w/ Jessup·4 w/ the
Denmark
LOCATION5 w/ Jessup·4 w/ the
George Mitchell
PERSON5 w/ Jessup·4 w/ the
Geoffrey S. Berman
PERSON5 w/ Jessup·4 w/ the
Marc Rich
PERSON5 w/ Jessup·4 w/ the
EV
Evans
PERSON5 w/ Jessup·4 w/ the
Hanson
PERSON5 w/ Jessup·4 w/ the