Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
s true in general is not true in the particular case ... '" United States v. Dominguez, 783 F.2d 702, 707 (7th Cir. 1986) (quoting United States v. Jessup, 757 F.2d 378, 384 (1st Cir.1985)). "The quantum of evidence required to rebut the presumption is not high." United States v. Thompson, No. 16-CR-00
als at the Department of Justice reviewed the NPA and either authorized or helped negotiate the resolution of the matter. See, e.g., United States' Second Supplemental Privilege Log filed as Dkt. 329-1 in Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 v. United States, No. 08-CV-80736 (S.D. Fla.) (the "CVRA litigation") (illustrating the number o
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
s true in general is not true in the particular case ... '" United States v. Dominguez, 783 F.2d 702, 707 (7th Cir. 1986) (quoting United States v. Jessup, 757 F.2d 378, 384 (1st Cir.1985)). "The quantum of evidence required to rebut the presumption is not high." United States v. Thompson, No. 16-CR-00
als at the Department of Justice reviewed the NPA and either authorized or helped negotiate the resolution of the matter. See, e.g., United States' Second Supplemental Privilege Log filed as Dkt. 329-1 in Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 v. United States, No. 08-CV-80736 (S.D. Fla.) (the "CVRA litigation") (illustrating the number o
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
s true in general is not true in the particular case ... '" United States v. Dominguez, 783 F.2d 702, 707 (7th Cir. 1986) (quoting United States v. Jessup, 757 F.2d 378, 384 (1st Cir.1985)). "The quantum of evidence required to rebut the presumption is not high." United States v. Thompson, No. 16-CR-00
als at the Department of Justice reviewed the NPA and either authorized or helped negotiate the resolution of the matter. See, e.g., United States' Second Supplemental Privilege Log filed as Dkt. 329-1 in Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 v. United States, No. 08-CV-80736 (S.D. Fla.) (the "CVRA litigation") (illustrating the number o
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
s true in general is not true in the particular case ... '" United States v. Dominguez, 783 F.2d 702, 707 (7th Cir. 1986) (quoting United States v. Jessup, 757 F.2d 378, 384 (1st Cir.1985)). "The quantum of evidence required to rebut the presumption is not high." United States v. Thompson, No. 16-CR-00
als at the Department of Justice reviewed the NPA and either authorized or helped negotiate the resolution of the matter. See, e.g., United States' Second Supplemental Privilege Log filed as Dkt. 329-1 in Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 v. United States, No. 08-CV-80736 (S.D. Fla.) (the "CVRA litigation") (illustrating the number o
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (127)
Entities connected to both Jessup and Second Supplemental Privilege Log
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON17 w/ Jessup·8 w/ Second
United States
LOCATION13 w/ Jessup·8 w/ Second
the Southern District
LOCATION11 w/ Jessup·8 w/ Second
Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATION11 w/ Jessup·7 w/ Second
Bernie Madoff
PERSON13 w/ Jessup·4 w/ Second
MD
Marc Dreier
PERSON12 w/ Jessup·4 w/ Second
KA
Karni
PERSON12 w/ Jessup·4 w/ Second
Second Circuit
ORGANIZATION12 w/ Jessup·4 w/ Second
JD
Jane Doe
PERSON4 w/ Jessup·8 w/ Second
MA
Martir
PERSON10 w/ Jessup·2 w/ Second
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION7 w/ Jessup·5 w/ Second
ET
Emmy Taylor
PERSON5 w/ Jessup·7 w/ Second
Marc Rich
PERSON5 w/ Jessup·5 w/ Second
New York
LOCATION6 w/ Jessup·4 w/ Second
Bernie Sanders
PERSON6 w/ Jessup·4 w/ Second
George Mitchell
PERSON5 w/ Jessup·4 w/ Second
Geoffrey S. Berman
PERSON5 w/ Jessup·4 w/ Second
Hanson
PERSON5 w/ Jessup·4 w/ Second
Pretrial Services
ORGANIZATION5 w/ Jessup·4 w/ Second
EV
Evans
PERSON5 w/ Jessup·4 w/ Second