Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
s true in general is not true in the particular case ... '" United States v. Dominguez, 783 F.2d 702, 707 (7th Cir. 1986) (quoting United States v. Jessup, 757 F.2d 378, 384 (1st Cir.1985)). "The quantum of evidence required to rebut the presumption is not high." United States v. Thompson, No. 16-CR-00
§ 1591. See Fierro, 2012 WL 13042630, at *4 ("[T]he TVPA is inapplicable to individual purchasers of sex from trafficking victims...").1° I° While Fiero represents the law in this district, Mr. Epstein notes that there is a division of authority on the scope of § 1591. See United States v. Jungers, 7
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
s true in general is not true in the particular case ... '" United States v. Dominguez, 783 F.2d 702, 707 (7th Cir. 1986) (quoting United States v. Jessup, 757 F.2d 378, 384 (1st Cir.1985)). "The quantum of evidence required to rebut the presumption is not high." United States v. Thompson, No. 16-CR-00
§ 1591. See Fierro, 2012 WL 13042630, at *4 ("[T]he TVPA is inapplicable to individual purchasers of sex from trafficking victims...").1° I° While Fiero represents the law in this district, Mr. Epstein notes that there is a division of authority on the scope of § 1591. See United States v. Jungers, 7
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
s true in general is not true in the particular case ... '" United States v. Dominguez, 783 F.2d 702, 707 (7th Cir. 1986) (quoting United States v. Jessup, 757 F.2d 378, 384 (1st Cir.1985)). "The quantum of evidence required to rebut the presumption is not high." United States v. Thompson, No. 16-CR-00
§ 1591. See Fierro, 2012 WL 13042630, at *4 ("[T]he TVPA is inapplicable to individual purchasers of sex from trafficking victims...").1° I° While Fiero represents the law in this district, Mr. Epstein notes that there is a division of authority on the scope of § 1591. See United States v. Jungers, 7
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
s true in general is not true in the particular case ... '" United States v. Dominguez, 783 F.2d 702, 707 (7th Cir. 1986) (quoting United States v. Jessup, 757 F.2d 378, 384 (1st Cir.1985)). "The quantum of evidence required to rebut the presumption is not high." United States v. Thompson, No. 16-CR-00
§ 1591. See Fierro, 2012 WL 13042630, at *4 ("[T]he TVPA is inapplicable to individual purchasers of sex from trafficking victims...").1° I° While Fiero represents the law in this district, Mr. Epstein notes that there is a division of authority on the scope of § 1591. See United States v. Jungers, 7
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (127)
Entities connected to both Jessup and Fiero
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON17 w/ Jessup·4 w/ Fiero
United States
LOCATION13 w/ Jessup·5 w/ Fiero
Bernie Madoff
PERSON13 w/ Jessup·4 w/ Fiero
MD
Marc Dreier
PERSON12 w/ Jessup·4 w/ Fiero
KA
Karni
PERSON12 w/ Jessup·4 w/ Fiero
Second Circuit
ORGANIZATION12 w/ Jessup·4 w/ Fiero
the Southern District
LOCATION11 w/ Jessup·4 w/ Fiero
Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATION11 w/ Jessup·4 w/ Fiero
MA
Martir
PERSON10 w/ Jessup·2 w/ Fiero
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION7 w/ Jessup·4 w/ Fiero
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON9 w/ Jessup·2 w/ Fiero
New York
LOCATION6 w/ Jessup·4 w/ Fiero
Bernie Sanders
PERSON6 w/ Jessup·4 w/ Fiero
Harry Reid
PERSON4 w/ Jessup·5 w/ Fiero
MW
Martin Weinberg
PERSON4 w/ Jessup·5 w/ Fiero
Geoffrey S. Berman
PERSON5 w/ Jessup·4 w/ Fiero
Marc Rich
PERSON5 w/ Jessup·4 w/ Fiero
George Mitchell
PERSON5 w/ Jessup·4 w/ Fiero
EV
Evans
PERSON5 w/ Jessup·4 w/ Fiero
ET
Emmy Taylor
PERSON5 w/ Jessup·4 w/ Fiero