Epstein Secrets

indispensable secrecy of the grand jury proceedings.'" United States v. R. Enterprises, Inc. , 498 U.S. 292, 299 (1991) (quoting United States v. Johnson , 319 U.S. 503, 513 (1943)). "The need to preserve the secrecy of an ongoing grand jury investigation is of paramount importance." In re Grand Jwy

eing forced to disclose the status of the grand jury investigation and the matters occurring before the grand jury to Epstein. Prior to its initial Motion to File Ex Parte Affidavits, Rules, the undersigned conferred with counsel for Intervenor Epstein, who advised that he opposes the granting of this motion. WHEREFOR

e indispensable secrecy of the grand kir), proceedings.'" United States v. It Enterprises, Inc., 498 U.S. 292, 299 (1991) (quoting United States v. Johnson, 319 U.S. 503, 513 (1943)). "The need to preserve the secrecy of an ongoing grand jury investigation is of paramount EFTA01728797 4 importance."

g •forced to disclose the status of the grand jury investigation and the matters occurring befiere the grand jury to Epstein. Prior to its initial Motion to File Ex Parte Affidavits, Rules, the undersigned conferred with counsel for Intervenor Epstein, who advised that he opposes the granting of this motion. WHEREFOR

the indispensable secrecy of the grand jury proceedings." United States v. R. Enterprises, Inc., 498 U.S. 292, 299 (1991) (quoting United States v. Johnson, 319 U.S. 503, 513 (1943)). "The need to preserve the secrecy of an ongoing grand jury investigation is of paramount EFTA00179094 importance." In

ing forced to disclose the status of the grand jury investigation and the matters occurring before the grand jury to Epstein. Prior to its initial Motion to File Ex Parte Affidavits, Rules, the undersigned conferred with counsel for Intervenor Epstein, who advised that he opposes the granting of this motion. WHEREFOR