Epstein Secrets

NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE NO.2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. CASE NO.; 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO.3, CASE NO.; 08-CV-80232-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO.4, CASE NO.; 08-CV-80380-MARRA/JOHN

or And Referring Discovery Motions To U.S. Magistrate Judge (the 1 In an effort not to repeat certain legal arguments set out in various Motions and Replies referenced below and identified herein by Docket Number, those motions and replies, with legal arguments, are specifically incorporated herein by r

e indispensable secrecy of the grand kir), proceedings.'" United States v. It Enterprises, Inc., 498 U.S. 292, 299 (1991) (quoting United States v. Johnson, 319 U.S. 503, 513 (1943)). "The need to preserve the secrecy of an ongoing grand jury investigation is of paramount EFTA01728797 4 importance."

TO QUASH GRAND JURY SUBPOENAS The United States, by and through the undersigned Assistant United States Attorney, hereby files this Surreply to the Replies filed by Witnessi and Intervenor Jeffrey Epstein,' and notes the following: 1. Both the witness and the intervenor assert that was excused from

the indispensable secrecy of the grand jury proceedings." United States v. R. Enterprises, Inc., 498 U.S. 292, 299 (1991) (quoting United States v. Johnson, 319 U.S. 503, 513 (1943)). "The need to preserve the secrecy of an ongoing grand jury investigation is of paramount EFTA00179094 importance." In

O OUASII GRAND JURY SUBPOENAS The United States, by and through the undersigned Assistant United States Attorney, hereby files this Surreply to the Replies filed by Witness William Riley and Intervenor Jeffrey Epstein,' and notes the following: 1. Both the witness and the intervenor assert that Mr. Ri