Epstein Secrets

Document 25 Entered on FLSD Docket 0718/2008 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. PLAINTIFF'S MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR STAY Plaintiff

ng the Motion to Stay. See S.D. Fla. L. R. 7.1.A.3. Notably, Defendant's Motion also contains no certification as to any such attempt as required by the Local Rules. See id. The Local Rules provide that the "fflailure to comply with the requirements of this rule may be cause for the court to grant or deny the m

-KAM Document 16 Entered on FLSD Docket 07'16'2008 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA NO. 08-80232-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 3, Plaintiff, 1. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. ORDER DENYING MOTION TO SEAL THIS CAUSE comes before the Court on Defendant Jeffrey

a timely manner within ten (10) days from the date of entry of this Order. Plaintiff may respond to Defendant's report within the time allotted by the Local Rules. Failure to respond to this Order shall result in an entry of default against Defendant. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at West Palm Beach, Palm Beac

the indispensable secrecy of the grand jury proceedings." United States v. R. Enterprises, Inc., 498 U.S. 292, 299 (1991) (quoting United States v. Johnson, 319 U.S. 503, 513 (1943)). "The need to preserve the secrecy of an ongoing grand jury investigation is of paramount EFTA00179094 importance." In

without being forced to disclose the status of the grand jury investigation and the matters occurring before the grand jury to Epstein. Pursuant to the Local Rules, the undersigned has conferred with counsel for Intervenor Epstein, who has advised that he opposes the granting of this motion. WHEREFORE, the Uni