Epstein Secrets

in TIG Insurance Corporation of America - 2 - EFTA00613623 Epstein v. Rothstein and Edwards Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMB/Division AG (TIG) v. Johnson, 799 So.2d 339 (Fla. 4'h DCA 2001). Consequently, Epstein would like to set a motion directed toward the sufficiency of the Privilege Log. 6. Epst

ivision AG (TIG) v. Johnson, 799 So.2d 339 (Fla. 4'h DCA 2001). Consequently, Epstein would like to set a motion directed toward the sufficiency of the Privilege Log. 6. Epstein wishes to proceed with discovery of Edwards' alleged damages, but the Motion to Dismiss the Amended Counterclaim is pending, and Epste

5) of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure as that Rule has been interpreted by the Fourth District Court of Appeal. 3. In TIG Insurance Corp. v. Johnson, 799 So. 2d 339 (Fla. 4'h DCA 2001), the court denied a writ of certiorari sought from an order requiring a party to produce documents because the

iness on Tuesday, March 1, 2011 to supplement these objections, if necessary. The request is being made because we were not able to begin reviewing the Privilege Log for these objections until late Thursday afternoon, on February 24, 2011, because the arrival of the Privilege Log and documents was not communicate

ocument 7-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/13/2008 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-80069-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE. NO. 1, by and through JANE DOB's FATHER as parent and natural guardian, and JANE DOB's FATHER, and JANE DOE's STEPMOTHER, individually,

s Nos. P-008891 thru P-009103; Documents bearing Bates Nos. P-009114 that P-009115; Documents bearing Bates Nos. P-009712 thru P-009819; A copy of the Privilege Log that was filed with the Court; and A copy of the Responses to your Requests for Admissions that were filed with the Court. Please let me know if y

'S MOTION FOR FINDING OF VIOLATIONS OF THE CRIME VICTIMS' RIGHTS ACT AND REQUEST FOR A HEARING ON APPROPRIATE REMEDIES CASE NO: 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson EXHIBIT B EFTA00185377 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 48-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/21/2011 Page 2 of 6 FO.302 (Rev. 10-64$) FEDERAL BUREAU

ned Assistant United States Attorney, hereby gives notice of its filing of its Privilege Log, which is attached hereto. The documents referenced in the Privilege Log are being delivered today to the Chambers of U.S. District Judge Kenneth A. Marra for ex parse in camera review, pursuant to the Court's Omnibus Or

r a legally sufficient privilege log under Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.280 (b)(5), as interpreted by the Fourth District Court of Appeal in TIG Ins. Corp. v. Johnson, 799 So. 2d 339 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). Edwards' privilege log is insufficient on its face in many respects. In addition, although the Special Master

rior to that time, although Epstein does not hereby waive the right to an in camera review with respect to any of the other materials referenced in the Privilege Log. Finally, the actual prejudice to and impact on Epstein by Edwards' willful and continued non-compliance is palpable. Epstein has been prejudiced