s Nos. P-008891 thru P-009103; Documents bearing Bates Nos. P-009114 thru P-009115; Documents bearing Bates Nos. P-009712 thru P-009819; A copy of the Privilege Log that was filed with the Court; and A copy of the Responses to your Requests for Admissions that were filed with the Court. Please let me know if y

ned Assistant United States Attorney, hereby gives notice of its filing of its Privilege Log, which is attached hereto. The documents referenced in the Privilege Log are being delivered today to the Chambers of U.S. District Judge Kenneth A. Marra for ex pane in camera review, pursuant to the Court's Omnibus Ord

ned Assistant United States Attorney, hereby gives notice of its filing of its Privilege Log, which is attached hereto. The documents referenced in the Privilege Log are being delivered today to the Chambers of U.S. District Judge Kenneth A. Marra for ex pane in camera review, pursuant to the Court's Omnibus Ord

ned Assistant United States Attorney, hereby gives notice of its filing of its Privilege Log, which is attached hereto. The documents referenced in the Privilege Log are being delivered today to the Chambers of U.S. District Judge Kenneth A. Mama for ex pane in camera review, pursuant to the Court's Omnibus Orde

ned Assistant United States Attorney, hereby gives notice of its filing of its Privilege Log, which is attached hereto. The documents referenced in the Privilege Log are being delivered today to the Chambers of U.S. District Judge Kenneth A. Marra for ex pane in camera review, pursuant to the Court's Omnibus Ord

iness on Tuesday, March 1, 2011 to supplement these objections, if necessary. The request is being made because we were not able to begin reviewing the Privilege Log for these objections until late Thursday afternoon, on February 24, 2011, because the arrival of the Privilege Log and documents was not communicate

ivision AG (TIG) v. Johnson, 799 So.2d 339 (Fla. 4'h DCA 2001). Consequently, Epstein would like to set a motion directed toward the sufficiency of the Privilege Log. 6. Epstein wishes to proceed with discovery of Edwards' alleged damages, but the Motion to Dismiss the Amended Counterclaim is pending, and Epste

rior to that time, although Epstein does not hereby waive the right to an in camera review with respect to any of the other materials referenced in the Privilege Log. Finally, the actual prejudice to and impact on Epstein by Edwards' willful and continued non-compliance is palpable. Epstein has been prejudiced

s Nos. P-008891 thru P-009103; Documents bearing Bates Nos. P-009114 that P-009115; Documents bearing Bates Nos. P-009712 thru P-009819; A copy of the Privilege Log that was filed with the Court; and A copy of the Responses to your Requests for Admissions that were filed with the Court. Please let me know if y

ned Assistant United States Attorney, hereby gives notice of its filing of its Privilege Log, which is attached hereto. The documents referenced in the Privilege Log are being delivered today to the Chambers of U.S. District Judge Kenneth A. Marra for ex parse in camera review, pursuant to the Court's Omnibus Or

ned Assistant United States Attorney, hereby gives notice of its filing of its Privilege Log, which is attached hereto. The documents referenced in the Privilege Log are being delivered today to the Chambers of U.S. District Judge Kenneth A. Marra for ex parte in camera review, pursuant to the Court's Omnibus Or

ned Assistant United States Attorney, hereby gives notice of its filing of its Privilege Log, which is attached hereto. The documents referenced in the Privilege Log are being delivered today to the Chambers of U.S. District Judge Kenneth A. Marra for ex pane in camera review, pursuant to the Court's Omnibus Ord