Epstein Secrets

M v. Jeffrey Epstein, 502008CA028051XXXXMB AB; EW v. Jeffrey Epstein, 502008CA028058XXXXMB AB; and Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein, 08-80893- CIV Marra/Johnson; deposition of Jeffrey Epstein, p. 23, line 4; p. 38, line 22. R. 809-10, citing amended complaint in Razorback Funding, LLC, et al. v. Scott W Rot

31-CR-COHN; Epstein's Answer and Affirmative Defenses to Edwards' Fourth Amended Counterclaim; depositions of Scott W Rothstein in In re: Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, PA; 09-34791-RBR and Razorback Funding, LW, et al. v. Scott W Rothstein, et al., Case No. 09-062943. R. 809, citing pleadings in LM v. Jeffrey Eps

aL, Case No. 09-062943(19); Deposition Transcript of Jeffrey Epstein. 502008CA028058XXXXMB AB; and Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein, 08-80893-CIV Marra/Johnson. Rothstein returned to South Florida in November 2009 to face federal criminal charges and civil claims by private investors arising out of what w

egedly misused. See Deposition Transcript of Bradley Edwards dated March 23, 2010; Deposition Transcripts of Scott W. Rothstein in In re: Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, PA; 09-34791-RBR and Razorback Funding, LLC, et al. v. Scott W. Rothstein, et al., Case No. 09-062943(19). 5 EFTA00799343 July 22, 2009 from Ed

he Court finds the privilege log is insufficient on its face and does not comply with the requirements of F.R.C.P. 1.280(b)(5) and TIC Ins. Corp. v. Johnson, 799 So. 2d 339 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). In all other respects the Motion is denied at this time." On May 8, 2012, Edwards provided Epstein with 163 pa

009 CA 040800XXXX MB AG (hereinafter "the Epstein lawsuit"). 4. On April 17, 2010, Epstein served a subpoena in the Epstein lawsuit upon Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, PA ("RRA") Bankruptcy Trustee Howard Stettin, seeking to obtain documents from the Trustee, which included documents from attorney Edwards related

to Take Charge of Property of \4 7/ Epst1 dn to Post a $15 million Bond to Secure Potential ent, in Jane Doe v. Epstein Case No. 08-CV-80893- arra/Johnson. The motion was reported in the press as was the ultimate goal (i.e., to "pump" the cases for investor following). However, the Court found "Plaint

on or about November 11, 2009, ned the approximate amount of $10,085.00; dee (M11)Toronto Dominion Bank, N.A. account 6860420923 in of Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A, Attorney Trust Account 3, which 2009, contained the approximate amount of $7 (BAI2)Toronto Dominion Bank, N.A. account Holding, which, on or

ervice List on this F te day of September 2009. 09/12/2019 Certificate of Service Jane Doe No. 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein Case No. 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON 6 P CONFIDENTIAL Agency to Agency Requet: 19-411 SDNY_GM_00331962 EFTA 00204688 EFTA02729672 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 305 Entered on

tervene and Petition for Access to certain court records in this case. It is our understanding that Bradley Edwards and William Berger of Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler have filed a similar motion on behalf of a non-party known as "E.W.," and that E.W.'s motion is set for hearing on June 10, 2009. The Post requests

5) of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure as that Rule has been interpreted by the Fourth District Court of Appeal. 3. In TIG Insurance Corp. v. Johnson, 799 So. 2d 339 (Fla. 4'h DCA 2001), the court denied a writ of certiorari sought from an order requiring a party to produce documents because the

472.6395 Fax lackermandpfowler-white.corn Robert B. Carney, Special Master 2281 Saratoga Lane West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Re: In re: Rothstein, Rosenfeldt Adler. U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of Florida, Fort Lauderdale Division; Case No. 09-34791-BKC-RBR Our File NO. 80743 Dear Judge Carney:

LM v. Jeffrey Epstein, 502008CA028051XXXXMB AB; EW v. Jeffrey Epstein, 502008CA028058XXXXMB AB; and Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein, 08-80893-CIV Marra/Johnson; Deposition Transcript of Jeffrey Epstein, p. 23; line 4-p. 38; line 22. 5 Among the allegations in the Razorback Complaint regarding the fraudulen

ly needed to keep the Ponzi Scheme from unraveling. [Cite Razorback and media reports]; Depositions taken of Scott W. Rothstein in In re: Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, PA; 09-34791-RBR. The court confirmed that there was no legitimate basis for filing Edwards' motion, calling it "devoid of evidence." See Order in

not hesitate to ask. Respectfully submitted, EFTA00193928 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. Related Cases: 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80993, 08-80811, 08-8089

t November 11, 2009, contained the approximate amount of $10,085.00; (BA11)Toronto Dominion Bank, N.A. account 6860420923 in the name of Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A, Attorney Trust Account 3, which, on or about November 11, 2009, contained the approximate amount of $720,892.08; (BA12)Toronto Dominion Bank,