472.6395 Fax lackermandpfowler-white.corn Robert B. Carney, Special Master 2281 Saratoga Lane West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Re: In re: Rothstein, Rosenfeldt Adler. U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of Florida, Fort Lauderdale Division; Case No. 09-34791-BKC-RBR Our File NO. 80743 Dear Judge Carney:

BERT D. CRITTON, JR.. ESQ., and MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ., 515 North Flagler Drive. Suite 400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401, BRAD EDWARDS. ESQ., Rothstein, Rosenfeldt Adler, 401 East Las Olas Boulevard, Suite 1650, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 and JACK A. GOLDBERGER, ESQ. Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss. P.A., 250 Australia

ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR., ESQ., and MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ., 303 Banyan Boulevard, Suite 400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401, BRAD EDWARDS, ESQ., Rothstein, Rosenfeldt Adler, 401 East Las Olas Boulevard, Suite 1650, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 and JACK A. GOLDBERGER, ESQ. Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, PA, 250 Australian

ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR., ESQ., and MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ., 303 Banyan Boulevard, Suite 400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401, BRAD EDWARDS, ESQ., Rothstein, Rosenfeldt Adler, 401 East Las Olas Boulevard, Suite 1650, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 and JACK A. GOLDBERGER, ESQ. Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, PA, 250 Australian

ee has found no probable cause in the above- you and the complaint was dismissed. In November 2009, The Florida Bar began an investigation into the Rosenfeldt Adler (RRA). According to a complaint filed by Herbert S in Case No. 09-34791-BKC-RBR, dated December 29, 2009, "[a]s p. defraud investors, [Scott Walter

egedly misused. See Deposition Transcript of Bradley Edwards dated March 23, 2010; Deposition Transcripts of Scott W. Rothstein in In re: Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, PA; 09-34791-RBR and Razorback Funding, LLC, et al. v. Scott W. Rothstein, et al., Case No. 09-062943(19). 5 EFTA00799343 July 22, 2009 from Ed

009 CA 040800XXXX MB AG (hereinafter "the Epstein lawsuit"). 4. On April 17, 2010, Epstein served a subpoena in the Epstein lawsuit upon Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, PA ("RRA") Bankruptcy Trustee Howard Stettin, seeking to obtain documents from the Trustee, which included documents from attorney Edwards related

ection as to grand jury materials). Exhibit B, at 36 n.13. Epstein also files as Exhibit C the August 4, 2010, hearing transcript; In re Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A., United States Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of Florida, Case No. 09- 34791-BKC-RBR, The following are statements made by William Scherer

t November 11, 2009, contained the approximate amount of $10,085.00; (BA11)Toronto Dominion Bank, N.A. account 6860420923 in the name of Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A, Attorney Trust Account 3, which, on or about November 11, 2009, contained the approximate amount of $720,892.08; (BAl2)Toronto Dominion Bank,

31-JIC Document 290 Entered on FLSD Dockot 06/09/201.0 P,go 1Q of 9Q (BAI()Toronto Dominion Bank, N.A. account 6860420923 in the name of Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A, Attorney Trust Account 3, which, on or about November 11, 2009, contained the approximate amount of $720,892.08; (BA12)Toronto Dominion Bank,

31-CR-COHN; Epstein's Answer and Affirmative Defenses to Edwards' Fourth Amended Counterclaim; depositions of Scott W Rothstein in In re: Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, PA; 09-34791-RBR and Razorback Funding, LW, et al. v. Scott W Rothstein, et al., Case No. 09-062943. R. 809, citing pleadings in LM v. Jeffrey Eps

t November 11, 2009, contained the approximate amount of $10,085.00; (BA11)Toronto Dominion Bank, N.A. account 6860420923 in the name of Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A. Attorney Trust Account 3, which, on or about November 11, 2009, contained the approximate amount of $720,892.08; (BAl2)Toronto Dominion Bank,

ly needed to keep the Ponzi Scheme from unraveling. [Cite Razorback and media reports]; Depositions taken of Scott W. Rothstein in In re: Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, PA; 09-34791-RBR. The court confirmed that there was no legitimate basis for filing Edwards' motion, calling it "devoid of evidence." See Order in

ely existed to serve another master, a sinister Ponzi scheme that operated out of Edwards's and co-defendant Scott Rothstein's law firm, Rothstein, Rosenfeldt Adler. As is now well-known, at that law firm, despite what its name implies, the main business was the creation and perpetration of a Ponzi scheme that

ng to recover funds for Rothstein's victims. The bankruptcy attorneys are suing Boden for the $1 million he received while working at the Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler law firm and an additional $36.7 million in damages. • Topics • Trials • Litigation • Bankruptcy • See more topics » o X Financially Distresse

tervene and Petition for Access to certain court records in this case. It is our understanding that Bradley Edwards and William Berger of Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler have filed a similar motion on behalf of a non-party known as "E. W.," and that E.W.'s motion is set for hearing on June 10,2009. The Post requests

tervene and Petition for Access to certain court records in this case. It is our understanding that Bradley Edwards and William Berger of Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler have filed a similar motion on behalf of a non-party known as "E.W.," and that E.W.'s motion is set for hearing on June 10, 2009. The Post requests

t November 11, 2009, contained the approximate amount of $10,085.00; (BA11)Toronto Dominion Bank, N.A. account 6860420923 in the name of Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A, Attorney Trust Account 3, which, on or about November 11, 2009, contained the approximate amount of $720,892.08; (BA12)Toronto Dominion Bank,

nspirators 43. Defendant, ROTHSTEIN, is an individual residing in Broward County, Florida and, at all times relevant hereto, was one of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A.'s founders, its managing partner and CEO. Rothstein is the admitted architect of the Ponzi scheme. On January 27, 2010, Rothstein pled guilty

nd PROSE COURT REPORTING AGENCY, INC. EFTA00599677 '1 Page 17 the room was completely full to capacity with as many employees of the Rothstein, Rosenfeldt Adler firm as were in attendance at work that day. 4 Q. And included lawyers, paralegals, support 5 staff, investigators? 6 A. Literally -- 7 Q.