Epstein Secrets

would contain only facts , not argument, not inferences, not incorrect innuendos. F2 Even after the U.S. Attorney's Office advised Petitioners that the Justice Department's position was that the CVRA's rights only attached upon the filing of federal criminal charges and, hence, that none of the Petitioners' proposed fac

he crimes which would be charged, and the number of persons who would be charged run afoul of the secrecy requirements codified in Rule 6(e). In re Grand Any Investigation , 610 F.2d at 217, 218. In light of these conflicting directives, the more conservative course is to treat all information related to grand jury pro

government investigation, does not violate Rule 6(e). A discussion of actions taken by government attorneys or officials, e.g., a recommendation by the Justice Department attorneys to department officials that an indictment be sought against an individual does not reveal any information about matters occurring before

he crimes which would be charged, and the number of persons who would be charged run afoul of the secrecy requirements codified in Rule 6(e). In re Grand Any Investigation , 610 F.2d at 217, 218. In light of these conflicting directives, the more conservative course is to treat all information related to grand jury pro

would contain only facts , not argument, not inferences, not incorrect innuendos. F2 Even after the U.S. Attorney's Office advised Petitioners that the Justice Department's position was that the CVRA's rights only attached upon the filing of federal criminal charges and, hence, that none of the Petitioners' proposed fac

he crimes which would be charged, and the number of persons who would be charged run afoul of the secrecy requirements codified in Rule 6(e). In re Grand Any Investigation , 610 F.2d at 217, 218. In light of these conflicting directives, the more conservative course is to treat all information related to grand jury pro