Epstein Secrets

time is clearly not of the essence regarding any notification to the identified individuals. Sincerely, itz RFP MIA 000010 EFTA00209056 •' • U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida 500 South Australian Ave.. Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 (561) 820-8711 Facsimile: (5

fendant is gljugggI in the case in which' victim seeks to assert her statutory rights.") (emphasis added) Since there has been no offense charged in Federal district court in this matter, the identified individuals necessarily do not qualify as "crime victims". In addition, the Attorney General Guidelines furthe

d period, in and around January 2008, there can be no dispute that Epstein's attorneys aggressively sought review of the NPA at higher levels within the Department of Justice, seeking relief from the obligations Epstein had undertaken in that agreement. First, he raised challenges to the United States Attorney's exercise

armed as a result of the commission of a Federal 20 EFTA00211737 offense or an offense in the District of Columbia, "if the offense is charged in Federal district court." Thus, if there was no offense charged in Federal district court, then a person could not be a crime victim for purposes of enforcing the ri

d period, in and around January 2008, there can be no dispute that Epstein's attorneys aggressively sought review of the NPA at higher levels within the Department of Justice, seeking relief from the obligations Epstein had undertaken in that agreement. First, he raised challenges to the United States Attorney's exercise

y and proximately harmed as a result of the commission of a Federal offense or an offense in the District of Columbia, "if the offense is charged in Federal district court." Thus, if there was no offense charged in Federal district court, then a person could not be a crime victim for purposes of enforcing the ri

d period, in and around January 2008, there can be no dispute that Epstein's attorneys aggressively sought review of the NPA at higher levels within the Department of Justice, seeking relief from the obligations Epstein had undertaken in that agreement. First, he raised challenges to the United States Attorney's exercise

y and proximately harmed as a result of the commission of a Federal offense or an offense in the District of Columbia, "if the offense is charged in Federal district court." Thus, if there was no offense charged in Federal district court, then a person could not be a crime victim for purposes of enforcing the ri

confident that the einannstances at issue warrant such an examination. Based on our collective experiences, as well as those of other former senior Justice Depanment officials whose advice we have sought, we have never before seen a case more appropriate for oversight and review. Thus, while neither of us has pr

fendant is charged in the case in which a victim seeks to assert her statutory rights.") (emphasis added) Since there has been no offense charged in Federal district court in this matter, the identified individuals necessarily do not qualify as "crime victims". In addition, the Attorney General Guidelines furthe