Epstein Secrets

age of 17, and the wholly consensual conduct in exchange for money which occurred between the two would not even have been a registerable offense in New York. See §168-a(2XaX0(§230 .04 a registerable offense only if "person patronized" is in fact under 17 years old). Indeed, at the time of the offense at

and order of the New York Supreme Court, Criminal Term, New York County, determining him to be a Level 3 sex offender, without designation, under New York's Sexual Offender Registration Act (SORA), Correction Law Article 6-C, based on a 2008 Florida conviction by plea of guilty to Procuring a Person Und

m EFTA00231540 To be Argued By: JAY P. LEFKOWITZ New York County Clerk's Index No. 30129/2010 Xeftr larrrit $upratte Txxurt APPELLATE DIVISION—FIRST DEPARTMENT PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, —against— JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, Respondent, Defendant-Appellant. BRIEF FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT JAY P. LEFKOWITZ

IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the undersigned counsel, that: 1. The return date for Plaintiff-Appellant's Motion and the City of New York's Cross-Motion, currently set for September 14, 2009 at 10:00 AM, is extended to September 28, 2009 at 10:00 AM, or as soon thereafter as counsel can

IN AND CO., Defendants-Respondents. New York County Index No. 113903/07 STIPULATION RFr.FiliF0 SEP 03 2009 APPELLAIbuivrolvc,, ouPREME COURT, FIRST DEPARTMENT IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the undersigned counsel, that: 1. The return date for Plaintiff-Appellant's Motion and the Cit

in a less-severe fashion. Strict reporting requirements would be particularly inappropriate, counsel urged, since defendant spent so little time in New York in the first place. Defendant's "primary residence is the U.S. Virgin Islands," counsel urged; and, in addition to his home in New York, he maintain

§ 169-8(3) 36 Fla. Stat 796.03 1 EFTA00602340 Ha. Stat. 796.07 1 EFTA00602341 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK APPELLATE DIVISION: FIRST DEPARTMENT THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, -against- JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant-Appellant. BRIEF FOR RESPONDENT INTRODUCTION Defendant,

in a less-severe fashion. Strict reporting requirements would be particularly inappropriate, counsel urged, since defendant spent so little time in New York in the first place. Defendant's "primary residence is the U.S. Virgin Islands," counsel urged; and, in addition to his home in New York, he maintain

§ 169-8(3) 36 Fla. Stat 796.03 1 EFTA00792502 Ha. Stat. 796.07 1 EFTA00792503 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK APPELLATE DIVISION: FIRST DEPARTMENT THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, -against- JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant-Appellant. BRIEF FOR RESPONDENT INTRODUCTION Defendant,

in a less-severe fashion. Strict reporting requirements would be particularly inappropriate, counsel urged, since defendant spent so little time in New York in the first place. Defendant's "primary residence is the U.S. Virgin Islands," counsel urged; and, in addition to his home in New York, he maintain

w § 169-8(3) 36 Fla. Stat 796.03 1 EFTA00181149 Fla. Stat 796.07 1 EFTA00181150 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK APPELLATE DIVISION: FIRST DEPARTMENT THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, -against- JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant-Appellant. BRIEF FOR RESPONDENT INTRODUCTION Defendant,