Epstein Secrets

e Doe’s argument that “equity will do what ought to be done.” Jane Doe’s Motion to Restrain Fraudulent Transfer of Assets at 17 (citing Sterling v. Brevard County, 776 So.2d 281, 284 (Fla. Ct. Apps. 2000)). The only question then is “what ought to be done?” Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 217 Entered on

of a receiver to take charge of Epstein’s property and to post a $15 million bond to secure any potential judgment in this case. As explained in Jane Doe’s motion, Epstein is a billionaire who recently has been fraudulently transferring his assets overseas and elsewhere with the intent to prevent Jane D

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 165 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/19/2009 Page 18 of 41 CASE NO: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON be done." Sterling v. Brevard County, 776 So.2d 281, 284 (Fla. Ct. Apps. 2000). The Court should therefore also exercise its equitable powers to impose the same remedies that Jane Doe

, Defendant I ------------- CASE NO: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON CASE NO: 09-CV-80591-MARRA/JOHNSON CASE NO: 09-CV-80656-MARRA/JOHNSON PLAINTIFF, JANE DOE'S MOTION FOR INJUNCTION RESTRAINING FRAUDULENT TRANSFER OF ASSETS, APPOINTMENT OF A RECEIVER TO TAKE CHARGE OF PROPERTY OF EPSTEIN, AND TO POST A $15

7 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 165 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/19/2009 Page 18 of 41 CASE NO: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON be done." Sterling v. Brevard County, 776 So.2d 281, 284 (Fla. Ct. Apps. 2000). The Court should therefore also exercise its equitable powers to impose the same remedies that Jane Doe

iff vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant JANE DOE NO. 102, CASE NO: 09-CV-80656-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant PLAINTIFF, JANE DOE'S MOTION FOR INJUNCTION RESTRAINING FRAUDULENT TRANSFER OF ASSETS, APPOINTMENT OF A RECEIVER TO TAKE CHARGE OF PROPERTY OF EPSTEIN, AND TO POST A $15