8
Shared Docs
6
Same-Page
8 / 8
Mentions
ssible misconduct by Department of Justice attorneys.” On February 6, 2019, the Department of Justice Office of Legislative Affairs advised Senator Sasse that OPR had opened vi an investigation into the matter and would review the USAO’s decision to resolve the federal investigation of Epstein
Page: 2020_11_OPR_Report_Executive_Summary_p6 →September 30, 2019, CVRA petitioner “Jane Doe 1” filed in her true name a petition for a writ of mandamus in the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, seeking review of the district court’s order denying all of her requested remedies. In its responsive brief, the government argued that “as a mat
Page: 2020_11_OPR_Report_Executive_Summary_p6 →ossible misconduct by Department of Justice attorneys." On February 6, 2019, the Department of Justice Office of Legislative Affairs advised Senator Sasse that OPR had opened EFTA01726262 an investigation into the matter and would review the USAO's decision to resolve the federal investigation of Ep
September 30, 2019, CVRA petitioner "Jane Doe 1" filed in her true name a petition for a writ of mandamus in the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, seeking review of the district court's order denying all of her requested remedies. In its responsive brief, the government argued that "as a matt
ively shut down investigations into his child sex trafficking ring and protected his co-conspirators in other states. Justice has not been served,' Sasse added."). OPR's Report is viewed as a "whitewash," letting everyone off the hook," "offensive," "hurtful," and like another slap in the face to the
ssent misses the point: we are not only deciding Ms. Wild's case today. The majority's opinion will set precedent for how CVRA suits will proceed in the Eleventh Circuit. The mere fact that an Assistant United States Attorney in this case recognized certain individuals as victims says nothing about how prosecutors a
ossible misconduct by Department of Justice attorneys." On February 6, 2019, the Department of Justice Office of Legislative Affairs advised Senator Sasse that OPR had opened EFTA00095564 an investigation into the matter and would review the USAO's decision to resolve the federal investigation of Ep
September 30, 2019, CVRA petitioner "Jane Doe 1" filed in her true name a petition for a writ of mandamus in the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, seeking review of the district court's order denying all of her requested remedies. In its responsive brief, the government argued that "as a matt
ossible misconduct by Department of Justice attorneys." On February 6, 2019, the Department of Justice Office of Legislative Affairs advised Senator Sasse that OPR had opened EFTA00095733 an investigation into the matter and would review the USAO's decision to resolve the federal investigation of Ep
September 30, 2019, CVRA petitioner "Jane Doe 1" filed in her true name a petition for a writ of mandamus in the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, seeking review of the district court's order denying all of her requested remedies. In its responsive brief, the government argued that "as a matt
ssible misconduct by Department of Justice attorneys.” On February 6, 2019, the Department of Justice Office of Legislative Affairs advised Senator Sasse that OPR had opened vi an investigation into the matter and would review the USAO’s decision to resolve the federal investigation of Epstein t
September 30, 2019, CVRA petitioner “Jane Doe 1” filed in her true name a petition for a writ of mandamus in the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, seeking review of the district court’s order denying all of her requested remedies. In its responsive brief, the government argued that “as a mat
September 30, 2019, CVRA petitioner "Jane Doe 1" filed in her true name a petition for a writ of mandamus in the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, seeking review of the district court's order denying all of her requested remedies. In its responsive brief, the government argued that "as a matt
Page: EFTA00013364 →ossible misconduct by Department of Justice attorneys." On February 6, 2019, the Department of Justice Office of Legislative Affairs advised Senator Sasse that OPR had opened EFTA00013364 --- PAGE BREAK --- an investigation into the matter and would review the USAO's decision to resolve the federal
Page: EFTA00013365 →September 30, 2019, CVRA petitioner "Jane Doe 1" filed in her true name a petition for a writ of mandamus in the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, seeking review of the district court's order denying all of her requested remedies. In its responsive brief, the government argued that "as a matt
Page: EFTA00023065 →ossible misconduct by Department of Justice attorneys." On February 6, 2019, the Department of Justice Office of Legislative Affairs advised Senator Sasse that OPR had opened EFTA00023065 --- PAGE BREAK --- an investigation into the matter and would review the USAO's decision to resolve the federal
Page: EFTA00023066 →Entities connected to both Sasse and the Eleventh Circuit

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSONJane Doe
PERSON
Kenneth Marra
PERSON
United States
LOCATION
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON
Bradley Edwards
PERSONthe Southern District
LOCATION
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION
Alexander Acosta
PERSONLeon Black
PERSON
Paul Cassell
PERSON
George W. Bush
PERSONFBI
ORGANIZATION
Julie K. Brown
PERSONMaria Farmer
PERSON
A. Marie Villafana
PERSON
Donald Trump
PERSONMartin Weinberg
PERSON
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION
Ben Sasse
PERSON