Back to Network
6
Shared Docs
6
Same-Page
6 / 9
Mentions
Document Mentions (6 shared documents)
3 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
a victim the right to "be treated with fairness and with respect for the victim's dignity and privacy." 18 U.S.C. § 3771(a)(8). As Magistrate Judge Orenstein observed in Turner: "Neither the text of the statute nor its legislative history provides guidance as to what specific procedures or substantive re
s Act case, in which it admitted that a physician, Dr. Jackson, was an employee of the Veterans Administration at the time he treated the plaintiff Sulkoff. Subsequently, the United States Attorney's Office became aware that Dr. Jackson was not an employee of the United States. When the United States so
ly if it pertains to a fact, not a legal conclusion. McCaskill v. SCI Mgmt. Corp., 298 F.3d 677, 681-82 (7th Cir. 2002)(Rovner, J., concurring). In Sulkoff v. United States, 2003 WL 1903349 (S.D. Ind. 2003), the United States filed its answer in a Federal Tort Claims Act case, in which it admitted that
3 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
a victim the right to "be treated with fairness and with respect for the victim's dignity and privacy." 18 U.S.C. § 3771(a)(8). As Magistrate Judge Orenstein observed in Turner : "Neither the text of the statute nor its legislative history provides guidance as to what specific procedures or substantive re
ms Act case, in which it admitted that a physician, Dr. Jackson, was an employee of the Veterans Administration at the time he treated the plaintiff Sulkoff. Subsequently, the United States Attorney's Office became aware that Dr. Jackson was not an employee of the United States. When the United States so
if it pertains to a fact, not a legal conclusion. McCaskill v. SCI Mgmt. Corp. , 298 F.3d 677, 681-82 (7 III Cir. 2002)(Rovner, J., concurring). In Sulkoff v. United States , 2003 WL 1903349 (S.D. Ind. 2003), the United States filed its answer in a Federal Tort Claims Act case, in which it admitted that
3 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
a victim the right to "be treated with fairness and with respect for the victim's dignity and privacy." 18 U.S.C. § 3771(a)(8). As Magistrate Judge Orenstein observed in Turner: "Neither the text of the statute nor its legislative history provides guidance as to what specific procedures or substantive re
s Act case, in which it admitted that a physician, Dr. Jackson, was an employee of the Veterans Administration at the time he treated the plaintiff Sulkoff. Subsequently, the United States Attorney's Office became aware that Dr. Jackson was not an employee of the United States. When the United States so
ly if it pertains to a fact, not a legal conclusion. McCaskill v. SCI Mgmt. Corp., 298 F.3d 677, 681-82 (7th Cir. 2002)(Rovner, J., concurring). In Sulkoff v. United States, 2003 WL 1903349 (S.D. Ind. 2003), the United States filed its answer in a Federal Tort Claims Act case, in which it admitted that
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
a victim the right to "be treated with fairness and with respect for the victim's dignity and privacy." 18 U.S.C. § 3771(a)(8). As Magistrate Judge Orenstein observed in Turner: "Neither the text of the statute nor its legislative history provides guidance as to what specific procedures or substantive re
s Act case, in which it admitted that a physician, Dr. Jackson, was an employee of the Veterans Administration at the time he treated the plaintiff Sulkoff. Subsequently, the United States Attorney's Office became aware that Dr. Jackson was not an employee of the United States. When the United States s
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
a victim the right to "be treated with fairness and with respect for the victim's dignity and privacy." 18 U.S.C. § 3771(a)(8). As Magistrate Judge Orenstein observed in Turner "Neither the text of the statute nor its legislative history provides guidance as to what specific procedures or substantive rel
s Act case, in which it admitted that a physician, Dr. Jackson, was an employee of the Veterans Administration at the time he treated the plaintiff Sulkoff. Subsequently, the United States Attorney's Office became aware that Dr. Jackson was not an employee of the United States. When the United States so
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
a victim the right to "be treated with fairness and with respect for the victim's dignity and privacy." 18 U.S.C. § 3771(a)(8). As Magistrate Judge Orenstein observed in Turner "Neither the text of the statute nor its legislative history provides guidance as to what specific procedures or substantive rel
s Act case, in which it admitted that a physician, Dr. Jackson, was an employee of the Veterans Administration at the time he treated the plaintiff Sulkoff. Subsequently, the United States Attorney's Office became aware that Dr. Jackson was not an employee of the United States. When the United States so
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (228)
Entities connected to both Orenstein and Sulkoff
Second Circuit
ORGANIZATION11 w/ Orenstein·6 w/ Sulkoff
United States
LOCATION9 w/ Orenstein·6 w/ Sulkoff
the Southern District
LOCATION9 w/ Orenstein·6 w/ Sulkoff
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION9 w/ Orenstein·6 w/ Sulkoff
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON9 w/ Orenstein·6 w/ Sulkoff
RU
Rubin
PERSON8 w/ Orenstein·6 w/ Sulkoff
JD
Jane Doe
PERSON8 w/ Orenstein·6 w/ Sulkoff
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION7 w/ Orenstein·6 w/ Sulkoff
Martha Stewart
PERSON7 w/ Orenstein·6 w/ Sulkoff
Prince Andrew
PERSON7 w/ Orenstein·6 w/ Sulkoff
The Court of Appeals
ORGANIZATION7 w/ Orenstein·6 w/ Sulkoff
Paul Cassell
PERSON7 w/ Orenstein·6 w/ Sulkoff
the Advisory Committee on Criminal Rules
ORGANIZATION7 w/ Orenstein·6 w/ Sulkoff
Cynthia Nixon
PERSON7 w/ Orenstein·6 w/ Sulkoff
MC
McNulty
PERSON7 w/ Orenstein·6 w/ Sulkoff
Bradley Edwards
PERSON7 w/ Orenstein·6 w/ Sulkoff
UR
U. L. Rev.
PERSON6 w/ Orenstein·6 w/ Sulkoff
Kenneth Marra
PERSON7 w/ Orenstein·5 w/ Sulkoff
FBI
ORGANIZATION6 w/ Orenstein·6 w/ Sulkoff
Eric Trump
PERSON6 w/ Orenstein·6 w/ Sulkoff