the Court of Appeals
ORGANIZATIONMotion for Finding of Violations of Crime Victim's Rights Act
ORGANIZATION4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
e, one of the reasons behind 6(e) is to protect the reputations of persons who are under investigation but not indicted. This is a corollary to what the Court of Appeals found to be a due process protection afforded by the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution — namely, "that the liberty and property con
el). CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, the United States respectfully requests that the Court deny, in part, Petitioners' Motion to Unseal its Motion for Finding of Violations of Crime Victim's Rights Act and Request for Hearing on Appropriate Remedies [DE48] and Exhibit A thereto and, instead, that the Court unseal only a redacted version of those p
e, one of the reasons behind 6(e) is to protect the reputations of persons who are under investigation but not indicted. This is a corollary to what the Court of Appeals found to be a due process protection afforded by the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution — namely, "that the liberty and property con
el). CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, the United States respectfully requests that the Court deny, in part, Petitioners' Motion to Unseal its Motion for Finding of Violations of Crime Victim's Rights Act and Request for Hearing on Appropriate Remedies [DE48] and Exhibit A thereto and, instead, that the Court unseal only a redacted version of those p
e, one of the reasons behind 6(e) is to protect the reputations of persons who are under investigation but not indicted. This is a corollary to what the Court of Appeals found to be a due process protection afforded by the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution — namely, "that the liberty and property con
el). CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, the United States respectfully requests that the Court deny, in part, Petitioners' Motion to Unseal its Motion for Finding of Violations of Crime Victim's Rights Act and Request for Hearing on Appropriate Remedies [DE48] and Exhibit A thereto and, instead, that the Court unseal only a redacted version of those p
e, one of the reasons behind 6(e) is to protect the reputations of persons who are under investigation but not indicted. This is a corollary to what the Court of Appeals found to be a due process protection afforded by the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution — namely, "that the liberty and property con
ers, CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, the United States respectfully requests that the Court deny, in part, Petitioners' Motion to Unseal its Motion for Finding of Violations of Crime Victim's Rights Act and Request for Hearing on Appropriate Remedies [DE48] and Exhibit thereto and, instead, that the Court unseal only a redacted version of those ple
Entities connected to both the Court of Appeals and Motion for Finding of Violations of Crime Victim's Rights Act

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
United States
LOCATION
Kenneth Marra
PERSON
George W. Bush
PERSON
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATIONthe Eleventh Circuit
ORGANIZATION
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON
Anderson
PERSON
North
LOCATION
Barry Diller
PERSONDow Jones & Co.
ORGANIZATIONthe District Court Clerk's Office
ORGANIZATIONJames Eisenberg
PERSONSuperior Court
ORGANIZATION
the Fifth Circuit
ORGANIZATION
Michael Douglas
PERSON
William Shakespeare
PERSON
Puerto Rico
LOCATIONHoly Land Foundation
ORGANIZATIONDouglas Oil Co.
ORGANIZATION