Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
8 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
3 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
to Procuring a Person Under 18 for Prostitution, Fla. Stat. § 796.03, and Felony Solicitation of Prostitution, Fla. Stat. § 796.07(2)(f), for which Appellant was sentenced to consecutive terms of 12 months and 6 months incarceration, followed by 12 months of Community Control. (Pickholz, J. at SORA heari
nreliable, based on allegations that were determined to be not prosecutable, and not provable by clear and convincing evidence? 3. In calculating Appellant's risk level under SORA, may the Court score points for consensual prostitution-related conduct involving 2 EFTA00792351 women who were seventee
rd's Recommendation Could Not Be Proven By Clear and Convincing Evidence. 20 B. The Court Improperly Relied on the Board's Recommendation Where the Facts Cited Therein Were Disputed and No Further Evidence Was Presented. 25 C. Determining Appellant To Be a Level 3 Offender Based on Factors That Were Not Proven
3 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
to Procuring a Person Under 18 for Prostitution, Fla. Stat. § 796.03, and Felony Solicitation of Prostitution, Fla. Stat. § 796.07(2)(f), for which Appellant was sentenced to consecutive terms of 12 months and 6 months incarceration, followed by 12 months of Community Control. (Pickholz, J. at SORA heari
nreliable, based on allegations that were determined to be not prosecutable, and not provable by clear and convincing evidence? 3. In calculating Appellant's risk level under SORA, may the Court score points for consensual prostitution-related conduct involving 2 EFTA00181039 EFTA00181040 women wh
rd's Recommendation Could Not Be Proven By Clear and Convincing Evidence. 20 B. The Court Improperly Relied on the Board's Recommendation Where the Facts Cited Therein Were Disputed and No Further Evidence Was Presented. 25 C. Determining Appellant To Be a Level 3 Offender Based on Factors That Were Not Proven
3 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
nreliable, based on allegations that were determined to be not prosecutable, and not provable by clear and convincing evidence? 3. In calculating Appellant's risk level under SORA, may the Court score points for consensual prostitution-related conduct involving 2 EFTA00231549 women who were seventee
to Procuring a Person Under 18 for Prostitution, Fla. Stat. § 796.03, and Felony Solicitation of Prostitution, Fla. Stat. § 796.07(2)(f), for which Appellant was sentenced to consecutive terms of 12 months and 6 months incarceration, followed by 12 months of Community Control. (Pickholz, J. at SORA heari
rd's Recommendation Could Not Be Proven By Clear and Convincing Evidence. 20 B. The Court Improperly Relied on the Board's Recommendation Where the Facts Cited Therein Were Disputed and No Further Evidence Was Presented. 25 C. Determining Appellant To Be a Level 3 Offender Based on Factors That Were Not Proven
Sponsored
3 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
to Procuring a Person Under 18 for Prostitution, Fla. Stat. § 796.03, and Felony Solicitation of Prostitution, Fla. Stat. § 796.07(2)(f), for which Appellant was sentenced to consecutive terms of 12 months and 6 months incarceration, followed by 12 months of Community Control. (Pickholz, J. at SORA heari
nreliable, based on allegations that were determined to be not prosecutable, and not provable by clear and convincing evidence? 3. In calculating Appellant's risk level under SORA, may the Court score points for consensual prostitution-related conduct involving EFTA00232669 women who were seventeen y
rd's Recommendation Could Not Be Proven By Clear and Convincing Evidence. 20 B. The Court Improperly Relied on the Board's Recommendation Where the Facts Cited Therein Were Disputed and No Further Evidence Was Presented. 25 C. Determining Appellant To Be a Level 3 Offender Based on Factors That Were Not Proven
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (140)
Entities connected to both Appellant and the Facts Cited Therein
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON34 w/ Appellant·4 w/ the
George W. Bush
PERSON23 w/ Appellant·4 w/ the
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON20 w/ Appellant·4 w/ the
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION19 w/ Appellant·4 w/ the
JG
Jack Goldberger
PERSON15 w/ Appellant·4 w/ the
New York
LOCATION15 w/ Appellant·4 w/ the
MW
Martin Weinberg
PERSON9 w/ Appellant·4 w/ the
New York City
LOCATION9 w/ Appellant·4 w/ the
Jay Lefkowitz
PERSON9 w/ Appellant·4 w/ the
U.S. Virgin Islands
LOCATION8 w/ Appellant·4 w/ the
Ruth Pickholz
PERSON7 w/ Appellant·4 w/ the
Criminal Term
ORGANIZATION7 w/ Appellant·4 w/ the
Brooks
PERSON7 w/ Appellant·4 w/ the
Sarah Ferguson
PERSON7 w/ Appellant·4 w/ the
MW
M. Weinberg
PERSON7 w/ Appellant·4 w/ the
Legislature
ORGANIZATION7 w/ Appellant·4 w/ the
Bill Richardson
PERSON7 w/ Appellant·4 w/ the
Fresh Del Monte Produce N.V.
ORGANIZATION6 w/ Appellant·4 w/ the
Felony Solicitation for Prostitution
ORGANIZATION6 w/ Appellant·4 w/ the
Pataki
PERSON6 w/ Appellant·4 w/ the