Epstein Secrets

Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, FL 33409 561-686-6300 Fax: 561-383-9424 [email protected] [email protected] Counsel for Plaintiff, C.M.A. Bruce Reinhart, Esq. Paul G. Cassell, Esq. ProHac Vice 332 South 1400 E, Room 101 Salt Lake City, UT 84112 801-585-5202 801-585-6833 Fax [email protected]

to Jane Doe's Injunction Motion Page 7 of24 Italian and Swiss investors. Id. '1[6. This statement is obviously intended to associate Epstein with Bear Sterns, a tarnished financial institution apparently involved in questionable international transactions in the 1980's, to somehow suggest Epstein is frau

wenty-eight years ago, in 1981, and that Epstein was merely questioned because the SEC believed "Epstein had information on insider trading at Bear Sterns." The foregoing assertions in Mr. Cassell's affidavit have absolutely no bearing on Jane Doe's Injunction Motion. Then, Mr. Cassell goes beyond the

Y 6, 2007 Palm Beach Litigation Invoices 1. Critton Retainer Agreementn (DKI Summary of Critton Retainer) 2. Burman, Critton, Luther & Coleman 3. Bruce E. Reinhart 4. Firm 5. William (Bill) Riley 6. Riley Kiraly DOCUMENT PRODUCTIONS REC'D FROM CRITTON EFTA00300516 GRM#004750680 DB Zwirn Folder #1 Corre

n Storch re Election/Consent Forms 10. Arbitration Correspondence from Stacy E. Yeung II. Joint Ltr Re Extension until Sept. 16 Submitted by FINRA (Bear Steams arbitration re Spector) FTC BEAR STEARNS LITIGATION III WORKING FILE Bear Stearns 1. Correspondence 2. FTC Customer Agreement 3. Customer Agre

ar Stearns Settlement Class Action/MDL Complaint EFTA00300523 Bear Stearns Arbitration (Harry Susman)(Finra Dispute Resolution. Inc)FTC & COUQ vs Bear Stearns & Warren Spector -Correspondence -FTC and The COUQ Foundation's Amended Statement of Claim -Statement of Answer (FTC & COUQ vs. Bear and Warren Spec

24 jaw Doe v. Eosteth Case No. 08-CV-80893-Marra/Johnson Epstein's Manorandwn of Law in Opposition to Jane Doe's Injunction Motion Page 24 of 24 Bruce E. Reinhart, P.A. ounse or ►e t 'ri Kellen Theodore J. Leopold, Esq. Spencer T. Kuvin, Esq. Ricci-Leo ' .ld, P.A. ounse 08-08804 or awl in •e ate. Case

his untenable connection. Similarly, Mr. Cassell states that Epstein was questioned by the SEC in 1981 regarding an insider trading investigation at Bear Steams involving EFTA00221934 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 198 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/13/2009 Page 7 of 24 Jane Doe v. EDSICia Case No. 08-CV-

tely twenty-eight years ago, in 1981, and that Epstein was merely questioned because the SEC believed "Epstein had information on insider trading at Bear Sterns." The foregoing assertions in Mr. Cassell's affidavit have absolutely no bearing on Jane Doe's Injunction Motion. Then, Mr. Cassell goes beyond the

existence, which was disclosed to the state court judge during the change of plea. 15. (a) Admit in part. While he was an Assistant U.S. Attorney, Bruce E. Reinhart learned confidential, non-public information about the Epstein matter. (b) Admit in part. While he was an Assistant U.S. Attorney, Bruce E. Reinhar

needs to answer these.] 23. Admit. 24. [I don't know what "valuable consideration" means. I had heard a rumor that Epstein was a cooperator in the Bear Steams investigation but this was never confirmed.] 25. Deny? 26. Admit. EFTA00205328