Epstein Secrets

ant failed to appear at deposition pursuant to subpoena and failed to appear at the hearing on plaintiffs motion for order to show cause). 4. Ms. Rivera did not notify the undersigned that she would not ( or could not) attend her properly noticed deposition. Nor did Ms. Rivera contact the undersigned

se 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 508 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/29/2010 Page 1 of 4 JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CIV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON I --------------- Related cases: 08-80232, 08-08380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-809

ant failed to appear at deposition pursuant to subpoena and failed to appear at the hearing on plaintiffs motion for order to show cause). 4. Ms. Rivera did not notify the undersigned that she would not (or could not) attend her properly noticed deposition. Nor did Ms. Rivera contact the undersigned

se 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 509 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/29/2010 Page 1 of 4 JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CIV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON _______________ ./ Related cases: 08-80232, 08-08380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-8

and was described as short wit ong hair, freckles and light colored eyes. LNU attende Middle School. LNU went to Epstein's residence prior to Rivera's first contact with him. During one of their conversations, Epstein asked "Do you know that girl that brought?" At the conclusion of the inter

sturbing, in terms of possible sex trafficking, was Epstein's relationship with owner of the MC2 modeling agency. According to a complaint filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, en alleged victim said that Epstein, Maxwell, and 'deliberately engaged in a pattem of racketeering that in

ugh the review of potential or abstract disputes,' Digital Props., Inc. v. City of Plantation, 121 F.3d 586, 589 (11th Cir.1997)." United States v. Rivera, 613 F.3d 1046, 1050 (11th Cir. 2010); see also Pittman v. Cole, 267 F.3d 1269, 1278 (11th Cir. 2001) ("The ripeness doctrine prevent[s] the courts

d Jury Matter UNDER SEAL EFTA00010491 --- PAGE BREAK --- Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 205-2 Entered on FLED Docket 07/05/2013 Page 19 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA IN RE: GRAND JURY PROCEEDINGS FEDERAL GRAND JURY 05-02(WPB) AND FEDERAL GRAND JURY 07-103(WPB) Sealed Order Granti