Epstein Secrets

ute is to impose punishment that is criminal in nature, the ex post facto clause is implicated." See generally, Roman Catholic Bishop of Oakland v. Superior Court, 28 Cal.Rptr.3d 355, at 360, citing Kansas v. Hendricks 521 U.S. 346, 360-61 (1997). The effect of applying the 2006 version of §2255 would be to t

net Counsel for Defendants Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen Bruce Reinhart, Esq. & Bruce E. Reinhart, P.A. 250 S. Australian Avenue Suite 1400 West Palm beach, FL 33401 561-202-6360 Fax: 561-828-0983 ecf()brucereinhartlaw.com Counsel for Defendant Sarah Kellen Respectfully submitted, EFTA0020127

ray of mandatory closure rules ... proves too much, and runs contrary to the very foundation of the right of access...." Globe Newspa- per Company" Superior Court, 102 S.Ct. 2613, 2622 (1982). Accordingly, having considered the briefs and argu- ments of counsel for the reasons set forth in this opinion, it i

n FLSD Docket 07/15/200 %ay U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida 500 Sough Australian Arc.. Suite 400 West Palm !leach. Ft 53401 (5611820.87 I Facsimile August 11, 2006 Re: Crime Vicijins' and Witnesses' Ruth's Dear Miss a Pursuant to the Justice for All

ray of mandatory closure rules ... proves too much, and runs contrary to the very foundation of the right of access...." Globe Newspa- per Company Superior Court, 102 S.Ct. 2613, 2622 (1982). Accordingly, having considered the briefs and argu- ments of counsel for the reasons set forth in this opinion, it i

red on FLSD Docket 07/15/200 U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of Florida 500 South Australian Ave., Suite 400 West Palm (leach. FL 33401 (56!) 8204711 Facsimile, (SW 820-8777 August I I, 2006 D F; VI! CIF IN %/LAMM j,.. Mi Re: Crime Victims' and Witnessa:Righis