Epstein Secrets

endant also asserts without support or explanation that “confusion will result and motions in limine will undoubtedly be filed. . . .” In Ramsay v. Broward County Sheriff’s Office, 303 Fed. Appx. 761, 2008 WL 5237162 (11th Cir. 2008), the Court affirmed the District

ectfully submitted, By: s/ Stuart S. Mermelstein Stuart S. Mermelstein (FL Bar No. 947245) [email protected] Adam D. Horowitz (FL Bar No. 376980) [email protected] MERMELSTEIN & HOROWITZ, P.A. Attorneys for Plaintiff 18205 Biscayne Blvd., Suite 2218 Miami, Florida

r to consolidate actions, we have instructed that district courts should consider whether doing so could lead to prejudice or confusion.” Ramsay v. Broward County Sheriff’s Office, 2008 WL 5237162 *3 (11th Cir. 2008). The common and overlapping issues in this case, both factual and legal, are patent and o

pectfully submitted, By: s/ Stuart S. Mermelstein Stuart S. Mermelstein (FL Bar No. 947245) [email protected] Adam D. Horowitz (FL Bar No. 376980) [email protected] MERMELSTEIN & HOROWITZ, P.A. Attorneys for Plaintiff 18205 Biscayne Blvd., Suite 2218 Miami, Florida

mands on Plaintiffs’ counsel in other cases and matters. In particular, Plaintiffs’ counsel has an initial appeal brief due in Doe v. School Bd. of Broward County and Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 75 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/13/2009 Page 2 of 5 - 3 - Scavella, case no. 09 -10394-E, Eleventh Cir

pectfully submitted, By: s/ Stuart S. Mermelstein Stuart S. Mermelstein (FL Bar No. 947245) [email protected] Adam D. Horowitz (FL Bar No. 376980) [email protected] MERMELSTEIN & HOROWITZ, P.A. Attorneys for Plaintiffs 18205 Biscayne Blvd., Suite 2218 Miami, Florida